Citation :

Venkata Sushma Chinta, E. Rama Lakshmi, Kiran Kumar Amireddy, Ashutosh Sahu, Nagini Yarramsetty, Mallepula Saikiran Goud, "A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Hybrid TPU/PLA Hybrid Composites," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 10-20, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V13I8P102

Abstract

Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) and Polylactic Acid (PLA) are mostly used thermoplastics due to the special mechanical properties in Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM). PLA is brittle and hard, unlike TPU, which is extremely flexible, tough, and impact-resistant. Although additive manufacturing, materials development, optimization of processes, and the application of machine learning have made great progress, the majority of the current literature deals with single-material systems or homogeneous composites. Even though mixed composites and multi-material methods were explored, no study was done on structured layered hybrid composites with particular reference to the use of TPU alternating with PLA as a layer. Furthermore, ML models have been widely used in prediction, but a large-scale comparative study of layered hybrid TPU/PLA composites has not been conducted. This research focuses on the PLA/TPU alternate layered hybrid composite in an equal (1:1) ratio to acquire a balanced strength and ductile factor to be used in advanced applications in additive manufacturing. The mechanical properties of FDM-fabricated specimens, like Young’s Modulus (E or EM) and Tensile Strength (TS or TES), are found at various process parameters. The parameters considered for the Taguchi L27 experimental design are the Thickness of the Layer (LT), the Printing Speed (PS), the Temperature of the Nozzle (TPU/PLA NT), the number of Shell/Wall Layers (SL), and the Bed Temperature (BT) as parameters. The experiment was repeated three times, which gave evidence of the accuracy and repeatability of the experiment and obtained 27 experimental results. The experimental results indicate that the layer thickness and nozzle temperature are the most significant parameters that influence the mechanical performance. This is due to the fact that the thinnest layer has the most interlayer bonding and the highest tensile strength of 40.795 MPa and Young’s modulus of 1.188 GPa. With faster printing speed, the mechanical properties are reduced due to a reduction in interlayer adhesion. The tensile strength is most sensitive to the layer thickness. The nonlinear correlations between the process parameters and the mechanical properties are very complicated and are modelled using Machine Learning (ML) techniques such as Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). XGBoost has the highest predictive capacity with an R2 of above 0.99 for tensile strength and Young’s modulus, among others.

Keywords

PLA, TPU, Hybrid composite, Machine Learning.

References

1. Vinod G. Gokhare, D. N. Raut, and D. K. Shinde, “A Review Paper on 3D-Printing Aspects and Various Processes Used in the 3D-Printing,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 953-958, 2017.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
2. Aniket Jadhav, and Vijay S. Jadhav, “A Review on 3D Printing: An Additive Manufacturing Technology,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 62, pp. 2094-2099, 2022.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
3. N. Shahrubudin, T.C. Lee, and R. Ramlan, “An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 35, pp. 1286-1296, 2019.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. Amit Bandyopadhyay, Susmita Bose, and Suman Das, “3D Printing of Biomaterials,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 108-115, 2015.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. I. John Solomon, P. Sevvel, and J. Gunasekaran, “A Review on the Various Processing Parameters in FDM,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, pp. 509-514, 2021.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Ankit Sharma, and Aryan Rai, “Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) based 3D & 4D Printing: A State of Art Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 62, pp. 367-372, 2022.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. Vishal Wankhede et al., “Experimental Investigation of FDM Process Parameters using Taguchi Analysis,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, pp. 2117-2120, 2020.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Pawel Madejski, Isyna Izzal Muna, and Tomasz Machniewicz, “Thermo-Mechanical Characterization of 3D Printed Samples with Different Infill Patterns Produced by FDM Additive Manufacturing Technique,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 77, pp. 323-330, 2026.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Shady Farah, Daniel G. Anderson, and Robert Langer, “Physical and Mechanical Properties of PLA, and their Functions in Widespread Applications — A Comprehensive Review,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 107, pp. 367-392, 2016.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. Soyeon Park et al., “3D Printing of Polymer Composites: Materials, Processes, and Applications,” Matter, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43-76, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. Imran Khan et al., “A Review of Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Multi-Materials-based Polymeric Laminated Structures,” Composite Structures, vol. 349-350, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
12. Usharani Rath, and Pulak Mohan Pandey, “Experimental Investigations into Extrusion-based 3D Printing of PCL/CIP Composites for Microwave Shielding Applications,” Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 998-1021, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. Samarthya Bhagia et al., “Tensile Properties of 3D-printed Wood-filled PLA Materials using Poplar Trees,” Applied Materials Today, vol. 21, pp. 1-33, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
14. Muhammad Zulhilmi Zainuddin et al., “The Study of Degradation and Mechanical Properties of Poly(lactic) Acid (PLA) based 3D Printed Filament,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-8, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Amirhosein Ghaznavi Youvalari, Javad Alizadeh Kaklar, and Mahboube Mohamadi, “Investigation of Mechanical Properties in PLA, ABSand Epoxy Resin Parts Fabricated by 3D Printing Technology,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, pp. 1-16, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
16. Dongqing Pan, “A Comprehensive Study of Tensile Properties of 3D-printed Polylactic acid (PLA) Parts based on Statistical Analysis and Multi-Response Optimization of Printing Parameters,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 139, no. 11-12, pp. 6213-6232, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. Wojciech Jasinski et al., “3D Printing Wood–PLA Composites: The Impact of Wood Particle Size,” Polymers, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1-16, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. Shih-Chen Shi, Chia-Feng Hsieh, and Dieter Rahmadiawan, “Enhancing Mechanical Properties of Polylactic Acid through the Incorporation of Cellulose Nanocrystals for Engineering Plastic Applications,” Teknomekanik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 20-28, 2024. 
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
19. Yijin Xu et al., “Morphology and Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethanes with Dangling Chains in Ricinoleate-based Soft Segments,” Polymer, vol. 49, no. 19, pp. 4248-4258, 2008.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
20. Raïssa Gallu et al., “Tailoring of Morphology and Viscoelastic Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU)-Modified Bitumen Blends by Tuning the Diisocyanate,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 491, pp. 1-25, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. Tao Xu et al., “Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Material Affected by Various Processing Parameters,” Polymers, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1-16, 2020.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. Victor Beloshenko et al., “Mechanical Properties of Flexible TPU-Based 3D Printed Lattice Structures: Role of Lattice Cut Direction and Architecture,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 1-11, 2021.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Xingyu Wang et al., “The Generation Mechanism of Atomic-Scale Stick-Slip and Frictional Heat of TPU Under the Lattice Potential of Moving Metal: Molecular Dynamics Study based on DFT and Zero-Excitation PT Model,” Tribology International, vol. 213, 2026.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
24. Bin Zhang, and Wenhong Sun, “Flexible Self-Cleaning Temperature-Pressure Sensor Based on rGO/TPU Composite Film,” iScience, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1-13, 2026.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
25. Soo Yeon Jung et al., “3D Printed Polyurethane Prosthesis for Partial Tracheal Reconstruction: A Pilot Animal Study,” Biofabrication, vol. 8, no. 4, 2016.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
26. Budi Arifvianto et al., “Tensile Properties of the FFF-Processed Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Elastomer,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 1709-1719, 2021.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
27. Muhammad Nafiz Hamidi et al., “Influence of Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) and Printing Parameters on the Thermal and Mechanical Performance of Polylactic Acid (PLA) / Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Polymer,” Polymer Testing, vol. 143, pp. 1-21, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
28. Sahar Khorooty et al., “Additive Manufacturing of PETG-TPU Blends for Tunable Shape Memory Effect and Mechanical Properties,” Results in Engineering, vol. 30, pp. 1-15, 2026.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
29. Di Zhang et al., “Enhancing Performance and Reusability of Multi-Material Honeycomb Metamaterials via Blended FDM,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 315, pp. 1-24, 2026.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
30. Ritu Gupta et al., “Design of Experiment (DOE) for Optimization of PLGA Nanoparticles,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 36, no. S1, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
31. Elif Aktepe, and Uçman Ergün, “Machine Learning Approaches for FDM-Based 3D Printing: A Literature Review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1-28, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
32. R.S. Jayaram et al., “Machine Learning Driven Optimization of Compressive Strength of 3D Printed Bio Polymer Composite Material,” PLOS ONE, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1-20, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
33. Mohammad Hossein Nikzad et al., “Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Tensile Strength in 3D-Printed PLA Parts,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 264, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
34. Prashant Anerao et al., “A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)-Based 3D-Printed Wood/PLA Biocomposite,” Mechanics of Advanced Fiber Reinforced Composite Structures, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 261-270, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
35. Osman Ulkir, Gazi Akgun, and Arif Karadag, “Mechanical Behavior Prediction of 3D-Printed PLA/Wood Composites Using Artificial Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1-16, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
36.  Kuchampudi Sandeep Varma, Kunjee Lal Meena, and Rama Bhadri Raju Chekuri, “Optimizing Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Aramid Fiber-Reinforced Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Composite: A Systematic Approach using BPNN and ANOVA,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 56, pp. 1-16, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
37. Ahmadreza Eslaminia et al., “FDM-Bench: A Domain-Specific Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Additive Manufacturing,” Manufacturing Letters: Proceedings 53^rd SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference (NAMRC 53), Greenville, SC, USA, vol. 44, pp. 1415-1424, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
38. Youssef AbouelNour et al., “Tensile Testing Data of Additive Manufactured ASTM D638 Standard Specimens with Embedded Internal Geometrical Features,” Scientific Data, vol. 11, pp. 1-6, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]