Effect of Polymer on the Granular Biomass Activity, Size, and Morphology in the EGSB Reactor of the SWTP

International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science

© 2024 by SSRG - IJAES Journal

Volume 11 Issue 4

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : Ghulam Mustafa, Karen Jones, Cathy Parra, Paul Chappell, Allan Bate, Andrew Smith, Nicolas Daniel Spiccia, Felix Sharpe

10.14445/23942568/IJAES-V11I4P105

How to Cite?

Ghulam Mustafa, Karen Jones, Cathy Parra, Paul Chappell, Allan Bate, Andrew Smith, Nicolas Daniel Spiccia, Felix Sharpe, "Effect of Polymer on the Granular Biomass Activity, Size, and Morphology in the EGSB Reactor of the SWTP," SSRG International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science, vol. 11,  no. 4, pp. 36-41, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942568/IJAES-V11I4P105

Abstract:

Different doses of polymer (Solutrix100) on the biomass activity showed that increasing concentration up to 20 ppm did not affect the microbial activity (0.93 g/g Vs.d) as compared to control (0.83 g/g Vs.d). Instead, an increase of 21% was found in biomass activity with 20 ppm dose. However, an 18% decrease in biomass activity was found at 30 ppm as compared to control. Two polymer doses, 20 and 30 ppm, were applied, and the biomass activity was compared with the control. Different levels of COD were tested, ranging between 4869 to 6673 ppm, through the mill wastewater to see the effect of the polymer on the different parameters. Solutrix100 dose of 20 ppm increased by 2% pH. However, this dose slightly increased VFA production (51%) compared to the respective control (46%). sCOD removal efficiency decreased due to the addition of polymer from 80 to 64 %. The reduction in Ca concentration was 11% at 20 ppm during the treatment. Visual observations of granules revealed that granules were black and shiny and did not affect the shiny surfaces due to the increasing Solutrix100 concentrations. The shape of the granules was round to oblong in the case of 20 ppm, and they were not shiny but oblong at 30 ppm treatments compared to the control. However, the granular diameter was reduced (40%) because of the Solutrix100 application as compared to the control, but it showed a positive effect on biomass activity at a lower dose only. Gelatinous material around the granules was observed due to the 30 ppm dose. This was fibrous filamentous and different from the inside of the granule porous material. This aspect requires further study to explore.

Keywords:

Biomass, Solutrix100, BAT, COD, Volatile fatty acids, Gelatinous material.

References:

[1] You-Wei Cui, Ji-Lin Huang, and Fakhri Alam, “Fast Granulation of Halophilic Activated Sludge Treating Low-Strength Organic Saline Wastewater Via the Addition of Divalent Cations,” Chemosphere, vol. 264, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Maria Cristina Gagliano et al., “Calcium Effect on Microbial Activity and Biomass Aggregation During Anaerobic Digestion at High Salinity,” New Biotechnology, vol. 56, pp. 114-122, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Masako Nishimura, Kaori Ichikawa, and Masahiko Ajima, “Features and Applications of Hitachi Tabletop Microscope TM3030Plus,” Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, vol. 7, pp. 71-77, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Freda R. Hawkes, T. Donnelly, and G. K. Anderson, “Comparative Performance of Anaerobic Digesters Operating on Ice-Cream Wastewater,” Water Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 525-533, 1995.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Manufactures Water Quality Testing and Analytical Instruments and Reagents, Hach, Australia, 2015. [Online]. Available: shttps://au.hach.com.
[6] BASF-Australia, Basf.com, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://basf.com.au
[7] Cole-Parmer, Coleparmer.com, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.coleparmer.com
[8] [Online]. Available: https://www.whatman.com
[9] G. Lettinga et al., “Use of the Upflow Sludge Blanket (USB) Reactor Concept for Biological Wastewater Treatment, Especially for Anaerobic Treatment,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 699-734, 1980.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Jing Xiang Lim, and Vel Murugan Vadivelu, “Enhanced Volatile Fatty Acid Production in Sequencing Batch Reactor: Microbial Population and Growth Kinetics Evaluation,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2124, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Daniela Lovarelli et al., “Agricultural Small Anaerobic Digestion Plants: Combining Economic and Environmental Assessment,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 128, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Duc Nguyen et al., “Chapter 31 - Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion: Status and Perspectives,” Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals, pp. 763-778, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Tania Pérez-Pérez et al., “Performance of EGSB Reactor Using Natural Zeolite as Support for Treatment of Synthetic Swine Wastewater,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Arjen Rinzema, Herbert van Veen, and Gatze Lettinga, “Anaerobic Digestion of Triglyceride Emulsion in Expanded Granular Sludge Bed Reactors with Modified Sludge Separators,” Environmental Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 423-432, 1993.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] S Uyanik, P. J. Sallis, and G. K. Anderson, “The Effect of Polymer Addition on Granulation in an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR). Part I: Process Performance,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 933-943, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Randall A. Wirtz, and Richard R. Dague, “Enhancement of Granulation and Start-Up in the Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor,” Water Environment Research, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 883-892, 1996.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Tengyu Zhang, Endashaw Workie, and Jingxin Zhang, “Chapter 8 - Bioreactors for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion for Bioenergy and Biochemicals,” Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals, pp. 159-178, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]