Using the Malmquist Productivity Index to Evaluate the Technical Efficiency of Agricultural Production: A Case Study of Papaya Production in Taiwan

International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science
© 2024 by SSRG - IJAES Journal
Volume 11 Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Phitchayapha Khongdee, Ke-Chung Peng, Chun-Nan Lin
pdf
How to Cite?

Phitchayapha Khongdee, Ke-Chung Peng, Chun-Nan Lin, "Using the Malmquist Productivity Index to Evaluate the Technical Efficiency of Agricultural Production: A Case Study of Papaya Production in Taiwan," SSRG International Journal of Agriculture & Environmental Science, vol. 11,  no. 5, pp. 48-52, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942568/IJAES-V11I5P107

Abstract:

The study uses Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate papaya production in key Taiwanese cultivation zones from 2018-2021. Papaya yield is output, whereas seeds, labor, capital, fertilizers, and pesticides are inputs. Estimated county-level technical efficiency ratings measure production. The Malmquist Productivity Index explain productivity trends in which Nantou has the greatest mean technical efficiency, whereas Pingtung has the lowest and is falling. This study shows regional and temporal variability in Taiwanese papaya production efficiency. Prioritizing technical diffusion, input reallocation, and agricultural extension services can boost lagging regions' production to best practice.

Keywords:

Agricultural production, Data envelopment analysis, Malmquist productivity index, Papaya efficiency, Taiwan, technical efficiency.

References:

[1] MOA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eng.moa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=9501
[2] Tainan District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Tainan District. [Online]. Available: https://www.tndais.gov.tw/en/ws.php?id=2875
[3] COA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eng.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=9443
[4] COA, Raising Competitiveness, Leading the Way in the Internationalization of Taiwan’s Rural Economy, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://eng.coa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2505345
[5] Zhou Qiong, Wang Jia-Jia, and Zeng Yu-Rong, “Changes of Rice Production Efficiency in Taiwan,” Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1009-1018, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429-444, 1978.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Huang LiJun Huang LiJun, and Hu TongZe Hu TongZe, “Study of Agricultural Production Efficiency in China's Western Region Based on DEA Method,” Research of Agricultural Modernization, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 420-423, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Natalia Aldaz, and JoaquÍn A. MillÁN, “Regional Productivity of Spanish Agriculture in a Panel DEA Framework,” Applied Economics Letters, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 87-90, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Yuan Lei, Lei Guoping, and Zhang Xiaohu, “Evaluation of Agricultural Land-Use Economic Efficiency in Heilongjiang Province Based on DEA,” Resource Development & Market, vol. 12, pp. 1077-1079, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Kamiljon Akramov, and Mehrab Malek, “Analyzing Profitability of Maize, Rice, and Soybean Production in Ghana: Results of PAM and DEA Analysis,” International Food Policy Research Institute, pp. 1-28, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Malawal Phattarapong, Wongchai Anupong, and Peng Ke-Chung, “Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Sustainable Community Forest Management in Chiang Mai Province,” International Journal on Agriculture Research and Environmental Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1 14, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Nan Li et al., “Efficiency Evaluation and Improvement Potential for the Chinese Agricultural Sector at the Provincial Level Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),” Energy, vol. 164, pp. 1145-1160, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Kazim Baris Atici, and Victor V. Podinovski, “Using Data Envelopment Analysis for the Assessment of Technical Efficiency of Units with Different Specialisations: An Application to Agriculture,” Omega, vol. 54, pp. 72-83, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Pierluigi Toma et al., “A Non-Parametric Bootstrap-Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Environmental Policy Planning and Management of Agricultural Efficiency in EU Countries,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 83, pp. 132-143, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Emmanuel Alorzuke et al., “Technical Efficiency Evaluation of Maize Production in Ghana: An Application of Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Social and Environmental Management, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1-24, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Ali Sardar Shahraki, and Neda Aliahmadi, “Presenting a New Technique to Assess the Efficiency of Farms with Window-DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index: The Case of Barley Farms in Khash County, Iran,” International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49-64, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Ministry of Agriculture, MOA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://eng.moa.gov.tw/ws.php?id=2505449
[18] M.J. Farrell, “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 253-281, 1957.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Gerard Debreu, “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 273 292, 1951.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] O.R. Yolalan, “Efficiency Measurement and Data Envelopment Analysis,” Laval University, 1993.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] P. Lang, O. Yolalan, and O. Kettani, “Controlled Envelopment by Face Extension in DEA,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 473-491, 1995.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Satoshi Ohsato, and Masako Takahashi, “Management Efficiency in Japanese Regional Banks: A Network DEA,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 172, pp. 511-518, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Sten Malmquist, “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces,” Statistics Work, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 209-242, 1953.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] R. Färe et al., “Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharamacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 85-101, 1992.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Douglas W. Caves, Laurits R. Christensen, and W. Erwin Diewert, “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 1393-1414, 1982.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Rolf Färe et al., “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries,” The American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 66-83, 1994.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]