Citation :

Bramasta Putra Redyantanu, Reginaldo Christophori Lake, "Transition to Destination: Semiotic Design Strategies for Thematic Pedestrian Bridges in Jakarta," International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 34-46, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V13I9P103

Abstract

This study reveals that the infrastructure of Jakarta experienced a paradigm shift towards place-making/destination design strategies from bridges for functional pedestrian use. From an architectural semiotic perspective, this study identifies a design strategy that uses visual form, elements, and signifiers (space) to convey the signified meaning (conceptual) related to iconic public spaces. This shift is investigated utilizing three case studies of pedestrian bridge infrastructure in Jakarta, which are recognized as Jembatan Penyebrangan Orang: Tebet Ecopark (the Link JPO), the Gelora JPO in Sudirman, and Phinisi JPO in Karet. These issues were chosen due to the robust characteristics of their design, which are capable of representing public behavior through intentional visitation from transit. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study generates a formal evaluation of elements of semiotic architecture across visual, formal, and spatial dimensions. The research uncovers specific strategies of semiotics in every issue: the metaphor of the ship for Phinisi JPO, the Gelora JPO lighting dynamics, and the Ecopark JPO organic connectivity. The discussion illustrates that effective design strategies of semiotics transcend the infrastructure's technical functions, functioning as design narratives and a communication medium while building the identity from functionality. The objective of the study is to provide insights into the discourse of architecture concerning the meaning-making and narrative significance in establishing future architectural urban infrastructure, making sure its function as a sustainable and dynamic catalyst for urban life.

Keywords

Pedestrian bridge design, Transformation of urban infrastructure, Design narrative, Place-making strategy, Architectural semiotics.

References

1. Kenneth Frampton, Studies in Tectonic Culture: The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture, MIT Press, pp. 1-448, 2001.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
2. Željka Jurković, Željko Koški, and Danijela Lovoković, “Pedestrian Bridges as Elements of the New Urban Identity of Cities,” Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 14-28, 2021.
   [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
3. Ernest W. B. Hess-Lüttich, “Urban Discourse – City Space, City Language, City Planning: Eco-Semiotic Approaches to the Discourse Analysis of Urban Renewal,” Sign Systems Studies, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 12-33, 2016.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
4. Suesilowati Suesilowati, Heikal Bachtiar, and Rosandi Ardhi Noegraha, “Visitor Perceptions of the Existence of the Tebet Eco Park City Park,” International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69-76, 2025.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
5. Aneta Synowiec, “Pedestrian Bridges of the Vistula River Park and Strategic Revitalisation Projects: The Example of Cracow,” Sustainability, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 1-23, 2026.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
6. Ivana Štimac Grandi et al., “The Accessible Design of Pedestrian Bridges,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1-17, 2024.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
7. Aryana Soliz, and Ruth Pérez-López, “‘Footbridges’: Pedestrian Infrastructure or Urban Barrier?,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 55, pp. 1-9, 2022.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
8. Ayça Arslan, “Bridges as City Landmarks; A Critical Review on Iconic Structures,” Journal of Design Studio, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85-99, 2020.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
9. Santiago Rodriguez, “The Aesthetic Design of Pedestrian Bridges: An Engineer's Perspective,” Structures Congress, pp. 1-5, 2005.
   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
10. Weijia Wang, Kin Wai Michael Siu, and Kwok Choi Kacey Wong, “The Pedestrian Bridge as Everyday Place in High-Density Cities: An Urban Reference for Necessity and Sufficiency of Placemaking,” URBAN DESIGN International, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 236-253, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
11. Yulita Suryantari, Hubertina Karolina Ngarbingan, and Anisa Zahwa Akbara, “Tebet Eco Park’s Potential as a New Green Open Space in South Jakarta, Indonesia: An Analysis,” Journal of Tourism and Economic, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 107-119, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
12. Zhula Andita Rajasa, “JPO as an Element that Forms the Image of a Region: A Case Study of JPOS Pinisi, Karet Sudirman,” Thesis, UNPAR, pp. 45-48, 2023.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
13. Elbyansyah Rahmat Nur Pratama, and Wisnu Setiawan, “Study of Pedestrian Bridges (JPO) in the Senayan Area, DKI Jakarta,” Proceedings (SIAR) of the Scientific Seminar on Architecture, pp. 877-888, 2023.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
14. Pengzhen Lu et al., “Conceptual Design of the Pedestrian Bridge,” Structural Engineering International, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 470-483, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
15. Purnama Salura, and Bachtiar Fauzy, “The Ever-Rotating Aspects of Function-form-meaning in Architecture,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 7086-7090, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Reginaldo Christophori Lake et al., “Expression of Architectural Form of Buoyant Montessori School Kupang,” Journal of Design and Built Environment, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 31-43, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
17. Abdullah Hasif Patria, Ramzi Mohd. Hussain, and Izawati Tukiman, “The Significance of Pedestrian Pathways as Place Identity in an Urban Environment,” Semarak International Journal of Design, Built Environment and Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 72-83, 2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
18. Till Boettger, Threshold Spaces Transitions in Architecture: Analysis and Design Tools, Birkhäuser, pp. 1-158, 2014.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
19. Rilia Regina Mahagarmitha, “Revitalization and Conservation of Balikpapan City's Old Settlements as a City Identity,” RUAS, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 61-72, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
20. Bhakti Alamsyah, “Architectural Design of a City with Cultural Identity as a Sustainable Concept,” RUAS, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 14-19, 2014.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
21. Awang Eka Novia Rizali et al., “The Relationship between the form, Function, and Meaning of the Ferry Bridge (JPO) in the Jenderal Sudirman Street Area, Jakarta for the Urban Community,” Journal of Fine Arts and Design Dimensions, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 117-136, 2023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
22. Umberto Eco, A Theory of Semiotics, Indiana University Press, pp. 1-354, 1979.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
23. Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos, and Karin Boklund-Lagopoulou, Theory and Methodology of Semiotics: The Tradition of Ferdinand de Saussure, De Gruyter, pp. 1-367, 2020.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
24. James Jakób Liszka, A General Introduction to the Semiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana University Press, pp. 1-168, 1996.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
25. Erçim Uluğ, “An Investigation into the Connotations of Iconic Buildings by using a Semiotic Model of Architecture,” Social Semiotics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 279-300, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
26. Sammar Mahmoud Gomaa, “Semiotics in Architecture: From Symbolism to Spatial Configuration,” International Design Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 337-357, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
27. Tatyana Rusevych, “Semiotic Interpretation of Sign Forms in Architecture,” AIP Conference Proceedings: 5^th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Innovative Technology in Architecture and Design”, Kharkiv, Ukraine, vol. 2490, no. 1, 2023.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
28. Geoffrey Broadbent, and Anthony Ward, “Design Methods in Architecture,” DRS Conference Volumes, Portsmouth, United Kingdom, pp. 1-208, 1967.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
29. Philip D. Plowright, Revealing Architectural Design Methods, Frameworks and Tools, 1^st ed., Routledge, pp. 1-352, 2014.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
30. Anthony C. Antoniades, Poetics of Architecture Theory of Design, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 1-303, 1990.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
31. Yuan Huang, and Chang Wang, “Image, Symbol, and Philosophy: Meaning Construction and Semiotic Analysis in Graphic Design,” Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 232-245, 2024.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
32. B. Sumardiyanto et al., “Architectural Semiotics to Uncover the Denotative and Connotative Meanings of Buildings in Malioboro, Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta,” ARCHITECTURE: Journal Engineering Architecture, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 647-654, 2025.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
33. Wiwik Dwi Susanti, and Ikaputra, “Communicating Architectural Strategies (Semiotics),” International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 408-420, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
34. V. Pamporis, and A Micheli, “The Image of the Urban Space. Social Semiotics Readings, Data, and Assumptions,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: 3^rd International Conference on Environmental Design, Athens, Greece, vol. 1123, pp. 1-10, 2022.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
35. Ayub Muktiono, “Exploring the Potential of Architectural Semiotic in Realizing the Smart City Concept,” Neo Journal of Economy and Social Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41-46, 2024.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
36. Lois Frankel, and Martin Racine, “The Complex Field of Research: for Design, through Design, and about Design,” DRS Biennial Conference Series, pp. 1-13, 2010.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
37. John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Third Edition, SAGE Publications, pp. 1-270, 2002.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
38. Linda N. Groat, and David Wang, Architectural Research Methods, 2^nd ed., Wiley, pp. 1-480, 2013.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
39. Jeremy Till, “Is doing Architecture doing Research?,” 4^th International Conference on Research in Architecture and Urbanism, Valencia, pp. 1-9, 2012.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
40. Johan Verbeke, This is Research by Design, Design Research in Architecture, Routledge, pp. 137-160, 2013.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
41. Ray Lucas, and Raymond Lucas, Research Methods for Architecture, Laurence King Publishing, pp. 1-208, 2016.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
42. Ray Lucas, Drawing Parallels: Knowledge Production in Axonometric, Isometric and Oblique Drawings, Routledge, pp. 1-218, 2019.
    [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]