Seismic Comparison of OMRF and SMRF Structural Systems on High Rise Building
International Journal of Civil Engineering |
© 2018 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
Volume 5 Issue 5 |
Year of Publication : 2018 |
Authors : Aswathi P.M, Faisal Najeeb N.M, Fasna T, Mahmood, Muhammad Fayiz L, Sivakumar B |
How to Cite?
Aswathi P.M, Faisal Najeeb N.M, Fasna T, Mahmood, Muhammad Fayiz L, Sivakumar B, "Seismic Comparison of OMRF and SMRF Structural Systems on High Rise Building," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 45-52, 2018. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V5I5P109
Abstract:
Seismic analysis will ascertain the conduct of RCC structures during seism. The seismic evaluation greatly hinge on materials, ductility of structural members, strength, stiffness and reinforcement detailing. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (IS 1893:2002) have provisions to follow different framing systems. In this study ordinary moment resisting frames (OMRF) and special moment resisting frames (SMRF) are used as framing systems. A G+5 mini civil station building at Calicut is selected for the study. For the purpose of equivalence the G+5 building is modified to a G+10 building with all floors typical. The two buildings are rendered with SMRF and OMRF framing systems and analysed in four different seismic zones. The modeling of the structure is done in Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building System (ETABS) software. Thus sixteen models with SMRF and OMRF framing system in all seismic zones are generated and comparisons are made on analytical results such as maximum shear force, maximum bending moment and maximum story drift. This project will help in determining best framing system in high rise building in defying the earthquake encroachment.
Keywords:
Ordinary moment resisting frames (OMRF), Special moment resisting frames (SMRF), earthquake resisting structures, ETABS.
References:
[1] C. Ambika and N. Prerana. “Analysis and Design of R.C. Moment Resisting Frames with and without Shear Wall for Different Seismic Parameters.” International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 1(6),(2014).
[2] S. V. Itti, A. Pathade and R. B. Karadi. “A comparative study on seismic provisions made in Indian and international codes for RC buildings.”International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(1),(2006).
[3] G. V. S. Prasad and S. Adiseshu. “A Comparative Study of OMRF & SMRF Structural System for Tall & High Rise Buildings Subjected to Seismic Load.” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2319-1163,(2013).
[4] Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures (IS 1893:2002)
[5] V. Varghese and Y. R. Borkar. “Comparative Study of S.M.R.F. Building over O.M.R.F. Building With Seismic And Wind Effect.” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(3), 1501-1503,(2013).
[6] A. K. Yadav and A. Rai.“A Seismic Comparison of OMRF & SMRF Structural System for Regular and Irregular Buildings.”International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 5(3),(2017).