The Determination of Priority Scale for City Road Management in Banjarmasin

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2018 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 5 Issue 10

Year of Publication : 2018

Authors : Damayanti, Iphan F Radam

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V5I10P106

How to Cite?

Damayanti, Iphan F Radam, "The Determination of Priority Scale for City Road Management in Banjarmasin," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 5,  no. 10, pp. 33-40, 2018. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V5I10P106

Abstract:

The road management priority is needed by decision makers in serving public necessities in terms of accomplishment of equitable road infrastructure. In this research, the method used did not only have particular regard for non-technical factor which consisted of Development Plan Meeting (Musrenbang), public proposal, and policy, but also for technical factors. Technical factors were reviewed in terms of its management, namely the maintenance and improvement, each of which consisted of Average Daily Traffic (LHR), damage level, road network, land use, road function, and road class. The present research was aimed to obtain the priority rank of road management, by considering the factors that influenced the analysis using the AHP method. Based on the results of the AHP analysis, the factors that influenced the weighting in the AHP method towards the priority rank of road management in the City of Banjarmasin in this research are technical and non-technical factors. As for technical factors, they have 3 (three) times weight (75%) from that of non-technical factors’ (25%). However, in overall, judging from the fulfillment of non-technical indicators, they apparently have a massive weight: the most important factor is shown by Development Plan Meeting with a weight of 14.48%. As for the technical aspects, both for maintenance and improvement, they are shown by severe damage indicator with an interest level of 8.63% in terms of maintenance, and 8.53% for improvement. The usage of the AHP method in determining the priority scale of road management is applicable to the role and commitment of the decision makers.

Keywords:

AHP, priority scale, city roads

References:

[1] Indonesian Republic Government. 2004. Law No. 38 of 2004 on Roads. Jakarta: State Secretariat. 
[2] Indonesian Republic Government. 2009. Law No. 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road Transport. Jakarta: State Secretariat. 
[3] Indonesian Republic Government. 2006. Government Regulation No. 34 of 2006 on Roads. Jakarta: State Secretariat. 
[4] Indonesian Republic Government. 2007. Law No. 26 of 2007 about Spatial Planning. Jakarta: State Secretariat. 
[5] Indonesian Minister of Public Works. 2011. Guidelines for Preparing Detailed Spatial Planning and Regency / City Zoning Regulations. Minister of Public Works Regulation Number: 20 / PRT / M / 2011. Jakarta: Ministry of Public Works Republic of Indonesia. 
[6] Neave, H. R. 2011. Elementary Statistics Tables (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. 
[7] Radam, I.F. 2017. Influence of Live Style on Mode Choice of River Transportation in Banjarmasin City (Pengaruh Gaya Hidup Terhadap Pemilihan Moda Transportasi Sungai Kota Banjarmasin). Dissertation, Doctoral Program of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University. 
[8] Sheskin, D. J. 2003. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures (3rd ed.). Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 
[9] Ott, R. L., & Langnecker, M. (2010). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. 
[10] Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., & Liang, T. P. 2005. Decision Suport System and Intelligence System Ed 7. Prentice Hall International. 
[11] Saaty, T.L. 2001. Decision Making For Leaders. Forth edition. University of Pittsburgh. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh. 
[12] Saaty, T.L. 1998. Multicriteria Decision Making : The Analytic Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh. 
[13] Saaty, T.L. 1990. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Pers. 
[14] Saaty, T. L. 1982. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in Complex World. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications. 
[15] Radam, I. F., Mulyono, A. T., & Setiadji, B. H. (2014). Typical River Transport for Banjarmasin Based on the Criteria of the National Transportation System. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES), 3 (8), 28-37. 
[16] Forman, E.H., & Sally M. A. 2001. Decision by Objectives. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 
[17] Putri, I.D. 2011. Penentuan Skala Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Kabupaten Di Kabupaten Bangli. Tesis, Program Magister Teknik Sipil, Universitas Udayana. 
[18] Syawal, A. 2013.“Perbandingan Skala Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Di Kabupaten Bengkayang Antara Metode AHP Dengan Metode Bina Marga”. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untan, Vol. 13, No. 2. 
[19] Hidayat, M.R. 2016. Pembuatan Prosedur Urutan Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Kabupaten Di Kabupaten Banjar. Tesis, Program Studi Magister Teknik Sipil, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. 
[20] Yuniarso, E., dan Handayani, D. 2017. “Analisa Prioritas Penanganan Jalan Di Kabupaten Pacitan (Studi Kasus Jalan Luar Kota).” Rekayasa Sipil, Vol. 6, No. 2, ISSN 2252-7699. 
[21] Government of Banjarmasin City. 2017. Mayor of Banjarmasin‟s Decree No. 548 of 2017 on The Status Determination of City Roads in Banjarmasin. Banjarmasin: Secretariat of Banjarmasin City. 
[22] Government of Banjarmasin City. 2013. Banjarmasin Regional Regulation Number 5 of 2013 on 2013-2032‟s City of Banjarmasin‟s Spatial Planning (RTRW). Banjarmasin: Secretariat of Banjarmasin City.