Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Planted Columns Supported on Reinforced Concrete Beams
International Journal of Civil Engineering |
© 2019 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
Volume 6 Issue 5 |
Year of Publication : 2019 |
Authors : Ahmed S. Rashed , Heba M. Issa |
How to Cite?
Ahmed S. Rashed , Heba M. Issa, "Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Planted Columns Supported on Reinforced Concrete Beams," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 16-22, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V6I5P104
Abstract:
Changing columns' positions or directions through different floor levels may cause many problems if not taken into design considerations. Unfortunately, there are no specifications or design requirements in the different codes of practice to design beams that have planted columns. This theoretical investigation aims to specify the planted column-beam connection's behavior, considering the beam width, the direction of the column, its dimensions, and shear reinforcement distributions. Therefore, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis was carried out for 17 models sorted into 5 groups. It was observed that the longer side of the planted column direction, which is perpendicular to the beam span, had better behavior in failure load and deflection than it was parallel to the beam span. Also, the planted column length preferred to be taken the same as the beam width for better behavior.
Keywords:
supported beams; planted columns; shear stresses; bending stresses.
References:
[1] Hansapinyo C., Maekawa K., and Chaisomphob T., Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Bi-axial Shear, Journal of Materials, Concrete Structures and Pavements, JSCE, 58(725),(2003),321-331.
[2] Waryosh W.A., Mohaisen S.K. and Yahya L.M., Behavior of Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Bi-axial Shear Loading, Journal of Engineering and Development, 18(2),(2014), ISSN 1813-7822.
[3] Chaisomphob T., Kritsanawonghong S. and Hansapinyo C. (2003), Experimental Investigation on Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Beam Subjected to Bi-axial Shear and Torsion, Songklanakarin Journal Science and Technology, 25(1),(2014),41-52.
[4] ANSYS user’s manuals, Structural Analysis Guide, Release 12.0, ANSYS Inc. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317,(2009).
[5] Egyptian Code of Practice, ECP-203, Design, and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structure, Ministry of Building Construction,( 2007).
[6] K.J. Willam, and E. P. Warnke, Constitutive Model for Tri-axial Behavior of Concrete, Seminar on Concrete Structures Subjected to Tri-axial Stresses, International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering Conference, Bergamo, Italy, (1974).
[7] ACI code, MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, Sixth Edition,(2011).
[8] Zuhiar A. Muhamed, Mohammed A. Abdulsaied Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Strengthened with and without SFRC Beams Subjected to Fatigue Loading, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 65(2) (2018) 102-106