Static Analysis of Rcc, Partially Encased & Fully Encased Composite Column Supported Elevated Water Tank

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2021 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 8 Issue 5

Year of Publication : 2021

Authors : Aniket P. Agrawal, Vishalkumar B. Patel, Vimesh V. Agrawal

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V8I5P102

How to Cite?

Aniket P. Agrawal, Vishalkumar B. Patel, Vimesh V. Agrawal, "Static Analysis of Rcc, Partially Encased & Fully Encased Composite Column Supported Elevated Water Tank," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 8,  no. 5, pp. 16-20, 2021. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V8I5P102

Abstract:

Water is one of the basic needs of humans; therefore, the proper storage of water is an essential requirement for a community. So that, it is required to make elevated water tanks perform better during earthquakes and make them safer. This paper contains the static analysis of square elevated water tank with RCC, Partially Encased & Fully Encased Column Supported Elevated Water Tank. The study is based on the advancements in construction technology to better use composite structures for earthquake resting structures. The analysis and comparisons are made for the combinations of different Staging Heights of 20m, 25m, & 30m and various Soil Conditions for the capacity of 10 lakh liters of water. The models are prepared with ETABS Software. The analysis is done based on the provisions given in IS 1893-Part 2: 2014, and the seismic parameters like Deflection, Drift, Fundamental Time &Base Shear have been compared.

Keywords:

Static Analysis, Fully Encased Section, Partially Encased Section, Deflection, Drift, Fundamental Time, Base Shear.

References:

[1] Johnson, R. P. (n.d.). Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete.
[2] Datta, D. (2016). Steel-Concrete Composite Construction – New Trend in India. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 01(01), 08–15.
[3] Alexander, V. B., Ashwin, W. D., Anand, N., & Jayalin, D. (2019). Studies on the effect of lateral force on different types of composite building frame systems. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6), 1857–1861.
[4] Panchal, D. R. (2014). New Techniques of Analysis and Design of Composite Steel-Concrete Structures. 3(3), 639–643.
[5] Kulkarni, K. L., & Kalurkar, L. G. (2016). Comparison between RCC and Encased Composite Column Elevated Water Tank. 13(5), 57–64.
[6] Papi, S. (n.d.). Static analysis of elevated composite water tank. 1–7.
[7] Dujmović, D., Androić, B., & Lukačević, I. (2015). C6 Composite column with fully concrete-encased H- section subject to axial compression and biaxial bending. 615–670.
[8] Taylor, P., Weng, C. C., Yen, S. I., & Wang, H. S. (n.d.). Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers A relative rigidity approach for design of concrete-encased composite columns CONCRETE-ENCASED COMPOSITE COLUMNS. (October 2014), 37–41.
[9] Data, D., & Book, H. (2015). Sri Jayachamarajendra College Of Engineering STEEL – CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES Compiled By.
[10] Bridge, R. Q. (2011). DESIGN OF COMPOSITE COLUMNS – STEEL , CONCRETE OR COMPOSITE APPROACH ? 4, 276–290.
[11] Decking, T. F. (n.d.). Designer’s floor decking guide contents.
[12] EN 1994-1-1, 2004 : Eurocode 4 Design of composite steel and concrete structures
[13] En 1998-1-1, 2004 : Eurocode 8 Design of structures for earthquake resistance.
[14] Parmar, M. K., Mevada, S. V., & Patel, V. B. (2018). Seismic Performance Evaluation of RCC Buildings with Different Structural Configurations. 1(February), 375–368. https://doi.org/10.29007/kj2r
[15] Parmar, M. K., Mevada, S. V., & Patel, V. B. (2018). Seismic Performance Evaluation of RCC Buildings with Different Structural Configurations. 1(June), 375–368. https://doi.org/10.29007/kj2r
[16] Agrawal, V. V, Bhojani, M., & Patel, V. B. (2016). Time History analysis of elevated water tank with different type of Bracing system using SAP2000 International Journal of Advance Research in Engineering , Science & Time History analysis of elevated water tank with different type of bracing system using SAP2000. (April).
[17] Patel, S. B., & Agrawal, V. V. (2018). Modification of response reduction factor ( R ) and Seismic analysis of RC frame staging ( SMRF ) intze Type elevated water tank . (June 2019).
[18] Jani, B. B., Agrawal, V. V, & Patel, V. B. (2020). Effects of Soil Condition on Elevated Water Tank Using Time History Analysis with Different Staging Systems. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(6), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/ijce-v7i6p105
[19] IS 11384, 1985 : CODE OF PRACTICE FOR COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION IN STRUCTURAL STEEL AND CONCRETE
[20] IS 3370-Part 1, 2019 : CONCRETE STRUCTURES FOR STORAGE OF LIQUIDS - CODE OF PRACTICE
[21] IS 456 - 2000 : PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE CODE OF PRACTICE
[22] IS 800 - 2007 : GENERAL CONSTRUCTION IN STEEL — CODE OF PRACTICE
[23] IS 1893-part 1-2016 : Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
[24] IS 1893-part2-2014 : Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures – Liquid retaining wall.