Mexican Sustainability Classification in Construction: Brief Review of Carbon, Life Cycle, and Water Footprints

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2024 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 11 Issue 1

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : Kenya Suarez-Dominguez, Ruth del Carmen Galindo-Lopez, Lisbeth A. Brandt-Garcia, Alejandra Nuñez-Ramos

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I1P101

How to Cite?

Kenya Suarez-Dominguez, Ruth del Carmen Galindo-Lopez, Lisbeth A. Brandt-Garcia, Alejandra Nuñez-Ramos, "Mexican Sustainability Classification in Construction: Brief Review of Carbon, Life Cycle, and Water Footprints," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I1P101

Abstract:

Sustainability has gained widespread recognition on a global scale. Yet, its interpretation varies among researchers who may lack familiarity with their specific field’s diverse criteria or possibilities. In the Mexican context, there is a dedicated effort to advance the development of new materials and sustainable processes for construction. Despite commendable initiatives, a significant issue arises from the insufficient determination of the environmental impact of these innovative materials. This gap is particularly pronounced in the swiftly evolving construction sector, where vernacular practices may align with sustainability criteria, but their environmental implications remain uncertain. To address this discrepancy, we propose a protocol brief review approach, providing a systematic method for evaluating the sustainability of materials or processes applied in construction. This approach underscores the importance of contextualizing sustainability criteria, recognizing that what may be considered sustainable in one environmental context may not hold the same designation in another. From a quantitative perspective, the proposal introduces a structured justification framework. This framework aims to guide researchers in articulating and substantiating claims regarding the sustainability of a given element, whether affirming or denying its status as sustainable. By integrating these considerations, this paper aims to enhance the precision and comprehensiveness of sustainability assessments within the construction realm. This contribution seeks to foster a more informed and nuanced understanding of the environmental impact of materials and processes in this dynamic field.

Keywords:

Sustainability criteria, Environmental impact analysis, Environmental footprint, Life cycle, Water footprints.

References:

[1] ISO 15392:2019, Sustainability in Buildings and Civil Engineering Works - General Principles. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/69947.html
[2] ISO 14067:2018, Greenhouse Gases, Carbon Footprint of Products, Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html
[3] Verónica Campos-Guzmán et al., “Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Review of Approaches for the Sustainability Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 104, pp. 343-366, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Yi Chih Yang, “Operating Strategies of CO2 Reduction for A Container Terminal Based on Carbon Footprint Perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 141, pp. 472-480, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Diana Ivanova et al., “Mapping the Carbon Footprint of EU Regions,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1-13, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Gabor Harangozo, and Cecilia Szigeti, “Corporate Carbon Footprint Analysis in Practice–with A Special Focus on Validity and Reliability Issues,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 167, pp. 1177-1183, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Thomas Wiedmann, and Jan Minx, “A Definition of Carbon Footprint,” Ecological Economics Research Trends, pp. 1-11, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Mariarosaria Lombardi et al., “Assessing the Urban Carbon Footprint: An Overview,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 66, pp. 43-52, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] United Nations Climate Change, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/es/sections/issues-depth/climate-change/index.html
[10] Mexico in the Face of Climate Change Official Parent Site. [Online]. Available: https://cambioclimatico.gob.mx/
[11] Tasseda Boukherroub et al., “Carbon Foot Printing in Supply Chains,” Sustainable Supply Chains, pp. 43-64, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Meenu Gautam, Bhanu Pandey, and Madhoolika Agrawal, “Carbon Footprint of Aluminum Production: Emissions and Mitigation,” Environmental Carbon Footprints, pp. 197-228, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Javier Pérez et al., “A Methodology for Estimating the Carbon Footprint of Waste Collection Vehicles under Different Scenarios: Application to Madrid,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 52, Part A, pp. 156-171, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Devi Maulida Rahmah et al., “Social Life Cycle Assessment of a Coffee Production Management System in a Rural Area: A Regional Evaluation of the Coffee Industry in West Java, Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1-21, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] ECLAC, Methodologies for Calculating the Carbon Footprint and Its Main Implications for Latin America, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), 2020. [Online].Available: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37288/Metodolog%EDas_calculo_HC_AL.pdf;jsessionid=FE3039E8198A1A14E8DF0777B892A66A?sequence=1
[16] Government of Mexico, National Emissions Registry RENE, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gob.mx/semarnat/acciones-y-programas/registro-nacional-de-emisiones-rene
[17] G. Asadollahfardi et al., “Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete with Different Mixed Designs,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 665-676, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] M. Manjunatha et al., “Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Concrete Prepared with Sustainable Cement-Based Materials,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 47, no. 13, pp. 3637-3644, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Sankar Karuppannan Gopalraj, and Timo Kärki, “A Review on the Recycling of Waste Carbon Fibre/Glass Fibre-Reinforced Composites: Fibre Recovery, Properties, and Life-Cycle Analysis,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 1-21, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Water Footprint in Mexico: Analysis and Perspective, from the Mexican Institute of Water Technology, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://agua.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Huella-hidrica-en-Mexico-bis.pdf
[21] Ángeles Suhgey Garay Jacome et al., “Estimation of the Water Footprint of Sugarcane Production for the Mills of the Papaloapan Basin,” Mexican Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 103-113, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Water, 2020. [Online] Available: https://www.fao.org/water/es/
[23] Chengqian Wang et al., “Microplastics in Urban Runoff: Global Occurrence and Fate,” Water Research, vol. 225, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Donat P. Hader et al., “Anthropogenic Pollution of Aquatic Ecosystems: Emerging Problems with Global Implications,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 713, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Luisa Baudino et al., “Recent Advances in the Lithium Recovery from Water Resources: From Passive to Electrochemical Methods,” Advanced Science, vol. 9, no. 27, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Jun Jie Zhu, and Zhiyong Jason Ren, “The Evolution of Research in Resources, Conservation & Recycling Revealed by Word2vec-Enhanced Data Mining,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 190, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Yolanda G. Aranda Jimenez, and Edgardo J. Suarez-Dominguez, “Determining the Carbon Footprint for A New Earthen-Based Finish,” International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 143-148, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Anlui Rodriguez-Carreon et al., “Biodegradation of Plastic Foams by Insect Larvae: A Sustainable Strategy?,” TIP Magazine Specialized in Chemical-Biological Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 1-10, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Chunbo Zhang et al., “Life Cycle Assessment of Material Footprint in Recycling: A Case of Concrete Recycling,” Waste Management, vol. 155, pp. 311-319, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Rosmery Aylin Tineo Alcantara et al., “Review of Sustainable Concrete Based on Photocatalytic to Reduce the Environmental Impact in Large Works in Peru,” Journal of Project Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91-98, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]