Influence of the Manufacturing Method on the Fire Resistance of Geopolymer Materials Based on Mining Slag
International Journal of Civil Engineering |
© 2024 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
Volume 11 Issue 2 |
Year of Publication : 2024 |
Authors : Arritokieta Eizaguirre-Iribar, Konstantinos Sakkas, Christos Georgopoulos, Xabier Olano-Azkune |
How to Cite?
Arritokieta Eizaguirre-Iribar, Konstantinos Sakkas, Christos Georgopoulos, Xabier Olano-Azkune, "Influence of the Manufacturing Method on the Fire Resistance of Geopolymer Materials Based on Mining Slag," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-14, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I2P101
Abstract:
Developing geopolymer materials based on waste is being promoted as an approach to reduce landfilling and encourage a circular economy. In this regard, high-performance geopolymers based on mining slag are developed for fire protection products, where the manufacturing method could have an influence. Accordingly, this paper assesses the fire resistance performance of two geopolymer products based on the same slag but produced considering two different manufacturing processes (precast and 3D printed), mainly focused on their use for tunnels. Furthermore, it studies other fire resistance evaluation methods (laboratory tests at different scales, in-situ tests, and computer based simulations), identifying their suitability for product development or research phases. On the one hand, results show that the production method affects the fire resistance performance since tested geopolymers reveal different thermal transmittance and mechanical behavior in prolonged or extreme fire exposure due to the diverse nature of the geopolymer material itself the first one is ductile material while the second a brittle material. In this sense, the 3D printed material shows a better thermal performance, but this can be significantly affected by the fastening configuration used. On the other hand, a step-by-step methodology based on the combination of the different fire resistance evaluation methods is presented to facilitate the product assessment during the various product development stages and for different system configurations or end-use applications.
Keywords:
Production methods, Geopolymer products, Fire performance, Waste valorization, 3D printing.
References:
[1] Abbas Mohajerani et al., “Recycling Waste Materials in Geopolymer Concrete,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 21, pp. 493-515, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] K. Mahendran, and N. Arunachelam, “Performance of Fly Ash and Copper Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-6, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Mugahed Amran et al., “Fire Resistance of Geopolymer Concrete: A Critical Review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 324, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Ikmal Hakem Aziz et al., “Manufacturing Parameters Influencing Fire Resistance of Geopolymers: A Review,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, vol. 233, no. 4, pp. 721-733, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Anna-Lena Hammer et al., “Alkali-Activated Sprayed Concrete as a Fire Protection Coating for Tunnels´ Inner Lining: Proof-of-Concept Study on the Heat Transfer,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structures in Fire (SiF2020), pp. 418-429, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Siyu Liu et al., “A Comparative Study on Environmental Performance of 3D Printing and Conventional Casting of Concrete Products with Industrial Wastes,” Chemosphere, vol. 298, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Hui Zhong, and Mingzhong Zhang, “3D Printing Geopolymers: A Review,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 128, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] S. Qaidi et al., “3D Printed Geopolymer Composites: A Review,” Materials Today Sustainability, vol. 20, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Ming Xia, and Jay Sanjayan, “Method of Formulating Geopolymer for 3D Printing for Construction Applications,” Materials & Design, vol. 110, pp. 382-390, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Hamada Elsayed et al., “Additive Manufacturing of Inorganic Components Using a Geopolymer and Binder Jetting,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 56, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] European Committee for Standardization, Fire Resistance Tests - Part 1: General Requirements (EN 1363-1), 2020. [Online]. Available: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/3d629772-3759-4990-987e-9c6ac1811651/en-1363-1-2012
[12] European Committee for Standardization, Fire Resistance Tests - Part 2: Alternative and Additional Procedures (EN 1363-2), 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-1363-2-1999-fire-resistance-tests-alternative-and-additional-procedures/
[13] Efectis, “Fire Testing Procedure for Concrete Tunnel Linings and other Tunnel Components (Efectis-R0695),” Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, pp. 1-46, 2020.
[Publisher Link]
[14] Noor Azim Mohd Radzi, Roszilah Hamid, and Azrul A. Mutalib, “A Review of Methods, Issues and Challenges of Small-Scale Fire Testing of Tunnel Lining Concrete,” Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 293-301, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Jang-Ho Jay Kim et al., “Fire Resistant Behavior of Newly Developed Bottom-Ash-Based Cementitious Coating Applied Concrete Tunnel Lining under RABT Fire Loading,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1984-1994, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Wei Ming Lee et al., “A Review of Test Methods, Issues and Challenges of Large-Scale Fire Testing of Concrete Tunnel Linings,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 392, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Zobaer Saleheen, Renga Rao Krishnamoorthy, and Ali Nadjai, “A Review on Behavior, Material Properties and Finite Element Simulation of Concrete Tunnel Linings under Fire,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 126, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Gabriel Alexander Khoury, “Effect of Fire on Concrete and Concrete Structures,” Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 429-447, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] European Federation of National Associations Representing Producers and Applicators of Specialist Building Products for Concrete (EFNARC), Specification and Guidelines for Testing of Passive Fire Protection for Concrete Tunnels Lining, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/8057044/mod_resource/content/0/Testing%2520fire%2520protection%2520systems%2520for %2520tunnels.pdf
[20] Emidio Nigro et al., “Fire Resistance of Concrete Slabs Reinforced with FRP Bars. Part II: Experimental Results and Numerical Simulations on the Thermal Field,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1751-1763, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Patrizia Bernardi et al., “Simulation Methodology for the Assessment of the Structural Safety of Concrete Tunnel Linings Based on CFD Fire – FE Thermo-Mechanical Analysis: A Case Study,” Engineering Structures, vol. 225, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Soon-Wook Choi, Junhwan Lee, and Soo-Ho Chang, “A Holistic Numerical Approach to Simulating the Thermal and Mechanical Behavior of a Tunnel Lining Subject to Fire,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 35, pp. 122-134, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Zobaer Saleheen, and Renga Rao Krishnamoorthy, “Numerical Simulation of Spalling and Moisture Evaporation in Concrete Tunnel Linings Exposed to Fire,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials, pp. 881-894, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] European Committee for Standardization, Test Methods for Determining the Contribution to the Fire Resistance of Structural Members – Part 3: Applied Protection to Concrete Members (EN 13381-3), 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-13381-3- 2015-test-methods-for-determining-the-contribution-to-the-fire-resistance-of-structural-members-applied-protection-to-concretemembers/?nakup=1075389
[25] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1-2: General Rules - Structural Fire Design (EN 1992-1-2:2023), 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1992.1.2.2004.pdf
[26] European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-2: General rules - Structural fire design (EN 1993-1-2:2005 + EN 1993-1-2:2005/AC:2009), 2005 + 2009. [Online]. Available: https://library.um.edu.mo/dissertation/b21618677.pdf