Experimental Investigation of Ferrogeopolymer Confinement for Enhancing Brick Masonry Column Resilience under Axial Compression

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2024 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 11 Issue 4

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : R. Jose Antony Syril, D. Rajkumar

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I4P108

How to Cite?

R. Jose Antony Syril, D. Rajkumar, "Experimental Investigation of Ferrogeopolymer Confinement for Enhancing Brick Masonry Column Resilience under Axial Compression," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 4, pp. 80-91, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I4P108

Abstract:

This study investigates the efficacy of ferrogeopolymer confinement in enhancing the resilience of brick masonry columns under axial compression. Previous research has explored various methods of enhancing masonry column resilience, including surface coatings and reinforcement layers. The novelty of the study lies in the utilization of ferrogeopolymer confinement. Fourteen samples are subjected to testing, each featuring different cross-sections and surface coatings (cement mortar and geopolymer mortar) with varying reinforcement layers (single or double-layer welded steel mesh). Results reveal the presence of brittle cracks influenced by mortar type and welded wire mesh reinforcement. Notably, findings demonstrate that geopolymer mortar and welded mesh contribute to improved compressibility, deformation, and load-bearing capabilities compared to unconfined specimens. Moreover, observed higher ductility ratios indicate a more flexible failure mode, particularly noteworthy for structural resilience. Importantly, the study highlights significant variations in energy absorption, with a notable increase observed with double-layer welded mesh, while geopolymer mortar exhibits superior energy absorption. These findings underscore the potential of ferrogeopolymer confinement as a promising strategy for enhancing the resilience of brick masonry columns, offering valuable insights into structural engineering practices.

Keywords:

Ferrogeopolymer, Masonry columns, Welded mesh, Confinement, Axial Compression.

References:

[1] Asaad Almssad, Amjad Almusaed, and Raad Z. Homod, “Masonry in the Context of Sustainable Buildings: A Review of the Brick Role in Architecture,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 1-18, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] M. Corradi, A. Grazini, and A. Borri, “Confinement of Brick Masonry Columns with CFRP Materials,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 1772-1783, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Svetlana Brzev, Earthquake-Resistant Confined Masonry Construction, pp. 1-81, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Sudhir K. Jain et al., “Application of Confined Masonry in a Major Project in India,” NCEE 2014 - 10th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1-11, 2014.
[Google Scholar]
[5] S.M. Mourad, and M.J. Shannag, “Repair and Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Square Columns using Ferrocement Jackets,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 288-294, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Luciano Ombres, and Salvatore Verre, “Analysis of the Behavior of FRCM Confined Clay Brick Masonry Columns,” Fibers, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-19, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Luciano Ombres, and Salvatore Verre, “Masonry Columns Strengthened with Steel Fabric Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (S-FRCM) Jackets: Experimental and Numerical Analysis,” Measurement, vol. 127, pp. 238-245, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Khalid Saqer Alotaibi, and Khaled Galal, “Axial Compressive Behavior of Grouted Concrete Block Masonry Columns Confined by CFRP Jackets,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 114, pp. 467-479, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Marinella Fossetti, and Giovanni Minafò, “Strengthening of Masonry Columns with BFRCM or with Steel Wires: An Experimental Study,” Fibers, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Jiří Witzany, and Radek Zigler, “Failure Mechanism of Compressed Reinforced and Non-Reinforced Stone Columns,” Materials and Structures, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1603-1613, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Matteo Canestri, Francesca Ferretti, and Claudio Mazzotti, “Confinement of Masonry Columns through SRG: Experimental Results and Analytical Prediction,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 44, pp. 2198-2205, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Habib Allah Poornamazian, and Mohsen Izadinia, “Prediction of Compressive Strength of Brick Columns Confined with FRP, FRCM, and SRG System using GEP and ANN Methods,” Journal of Engineering Research, pp. 1-14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Mohana Rajendran, “Corrosion Assessment of Ferrocement Element with Nanogeopolymer for Marine Application,” Structural Concrete Journal of the Fib, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2882-2894, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Taha Awadallah El-Sayed, “Axial Compression Behavior of Ferrocement Geopolymer HSC Columns,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 21, pp. 1- 31, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] J. Revathy, P. Gajalakshmi, and M. Aseem Ahmed, “Flowable Nano SiO₂ based Cementitious Mortar for Ferrocement Jacketed Column,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 22, pp. 836-842, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Mohana Rajendran, and Nagan Soundarapandian, “Geopolymer Ferrocement Panels under Flexural Loading,” Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 331-341, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] S.S. Arun Kumar, A. Madhavan, and S. Dharmar, “Experimental Srudy on Impact Resistance of Geopolymer Ferrocement Flat Panel,” International Conference on Recent Trends in Civil Engineering, Technology and Management, pp. 278–282, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Joseph Davidovits, “Geopolymer Cement A Review,” Geopolymer Science and Technics, pp. 1-11, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Joseph Davidovits, “Properties of Geopolymer Cements,” Proceedings First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, pp. 131-149, 1994.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Joseph Davidovits, “Geopolymer Chemistry and Sustainable Development. The Poly (Silicate) Terminology: A Very Useful and Simple Model for the Promotion and Understanding of Green-Chemistry,” Geopolymer 2005 Conference, Saint-Quentin, France, pp. 9-16, 2005.
[Google Scholar]
[21] Djwantoro Hardjito, and B. Vijaya Rangan, “Development and Properties of Low-calcium Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Curtin University of Technology, pp. 1-103, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Chakradhara R. Meesala, Nikhil K. Verma, and Shailendra Kumar, “Critical Review on Fly-Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Structural Concrete Journal of the Fib, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1013-1028, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] C. Prithiviraj, and J. Saravanan, “Flexural Performance of Alccofine-based Self-Compacting Concrete Reinforced with Steel and GFRP Bars,” International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1-12, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Chidambaram Prithiviraj et al., “Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Comprising a Copper Slag,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-21, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Prithiviraj Chidambaram, and Saravanan Jagadeesan, “Characteristics of Self-Compacting Concrete with Different Size of Coarse Aggregates and Alccofine,” Trends in Sciences, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1-17, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Chidambaram Prithiviraj et al., “Assessment of Strength and Durability Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Comprising Alccofine,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1-19, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Wu Chen, and Zhiduo Zhu, “Utilization of Fly Ash to Enhance Ground Waste Concrete-Based Geopolymer,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2018, pp. 1-11, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] B.G. Vishnuram et al., “Fly-Ash and GGBS Based Geo-Polymer Concrete with Granite Powder as Partial Replacement of M-Sand for Sustainability,” Materials Today Proceedings, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Gaurav Jagad, C.D. Modhera, and Dhaval Patel, “Experimental Investigation on Development of Compressive Strength of High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete Containing M-Sand,” Sustainable Building Materials and Construction, pp. 21-29, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] A. Chithambar Ganesh et al., “Durability Studies on the Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Made of M-Sand Under Ambient Curing,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 981, pp. 1-11, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] V. Sreevidya, R. Anuradha, and R. Venkatasubramani, “Experimental Study on Geopolymer Ferro Cement Slab using Various Wire Meshes,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 436-443, 2012.
[Google Scholar]
[32] V. Sreevidya et al., “Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer Ferrocement Elements,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 563-574, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] S. Kaliraj, P. Madasamy, and S. Dharmar, “Impact Behaviour of Geopolymer Ferrocement Trough Panel,” International Conference on Recent Trends in Civil Engineering, Technology and Management, pp. 496–500, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] T. Chaitanya Srikrishna, and T.D. Gunneswara Rao, “A Study on Flexural Behavior of Geopolymer Mortar Based Ferrocement,” Materials Today Proceedings, vol. 43, pp. 1503-1512, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Dharmar Sakkarai, and Nagan Soundarapandian, “Strength Behavior of Flat and Folded Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Ferrocement Panels under Flexure and Impact,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2021, pp. 1-13, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] T. Kibriya, “A Study on Use of Blended Ferrocement: A High Performance Material for Repair/Strengthening of Brick Masonry Columns,” WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 85, pp. 469-478, 2006.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Abid A. Shah, “Applications of Ferrocement in Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Columns,” International Journal of Geology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21-27, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Marinella Fossetti, and Giovanni Minafò, “Strengthening of Masonry Columns with BFRCM or with Steel Wires: An Experimental Study,” Fibers, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Enea Mustafaraj, and Yavuz Yardım, “Usage of Ferrocement Jacketing for Strengthening of Damaged Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Walls,” 3rd International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, pp. 19-21, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Debasish Sen et al., “Lateral Strength Evaluation of Ferrocement Strengthened Masonry Infilled RC Frame Based on Experimentally Observed Failure Mechanisms,” Structures, vol. 58, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] IS: 12269-1987, Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-17, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.12269.1987.pdf
[42] IS: 383-2016, Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1–21, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://icikbc.org/docs/IS383-2016.pdf
[43] IS: 9103-2018, Concrete Admixtures-Specification, Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-17, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://pdfcoffee.com/9103-reaffirmed-2018pdf-pdf-free.html
[44] R. Anu, and S. Thirugnanasambandam, “Development of Ambient Cured Geopolymer Bricks,” International Journal Advanced Research Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 229–236, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[45] S. Thirugnanasambandam, “Development of Geopolymer Concrete and Testing of Elements,” Chidambaram, Annamalai Nagar, 2018.
[Publisher Link]
[46] IS: 4031 (Part 6) - 1988, Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-11, 1988. [Online]. Available: https://ia600306.us.archive.org/35/items/gov.in.is.4031.6.1988/is.4031.6.1988.pdf
[47] IS 1077: 1992, Common Burnt Clay Building Bricks- Specifications, Bureau of Indian Standards, pp. 1-10, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.1077.1992.pdf
[48] ASTM A185-79, Standard Specification for Welded Steel Wire Fabric for Concrete Reinforcement, ASTM International, 1979. [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/a0185-79.html
[49] Ambhore Vinavak Parashram, “Behaviour of Ferrocement Encased Brick Masonry Columns,” Department of Civil Engineering University of Roorkee, pp. 1-69, 2000.
[Publisher Link]
[50] Amit Garg, “Ferrocement Applications in Repair and Retrofitting of Brick Masonry Columns,” Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, pp. 1-73, 2004.
[Publisher Link]
[51] Geeta Mehta, N.P. Devgan, and Amit Mehta, “Modified Failure Load for Brick Masonry Columns Encased with Ferrocement - An Experimental Study,” International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 321-325, 2017.
[Publisher Link]
[52] Lesley H. Sneed et al., “Confinement of Clay Masonry Columns with SRG,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 747, pp. 350–357, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[53] M.Q. Adnan et al., “Performance of Solid Masonry Columns After Strengthening,” Journal of Physics Conference Series, vol. 1973, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]