Enhancing the Adequacy of Indian Standard Rolled Steel I Sections by Increasing the Width of Flange
International Journal of Civil Engineering |
© 2024 by SSRG - IJCE Journal |
Volume 11 Issue 9 |
Year of Publication : 2024 |
Authors : Himala Kumari Golive, Garikipati Venkata Rama Rao, Markandeya Raju Ponnada |
How to Cite?
Himala Kumari Golive, Garikipati Venkata Rama Rao, Markandeya Raju Ponnada, "Enhancing the Adequacy of Indian Standard Rolled Steel I Sections by Increasing the Width of Flange," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 27-38, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V11I9P103
Abstract:
The scientific background behind the dimensioning of Indian Standard rolled I-sections available in IS 808 1989 may have been based on the Working Stress Method (WSM) of the design of steel structures. Due to the recent developments in the design philosophies (i.e., Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)) for the design of steel structures, it is important to establish the adequacy of Indian standard hot rolled steel sections. It is also necessary to assess the need to revise the dimensions of the rolled sections. The study presented in this paper evaluates the suitability of Indian standard hot-rolled steel I-sections as per the design guidelines given in the latest revision of the Indian Standard Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel (IS 800 2007). Laterally unsupported simple beams of spans 3 m, 6 m, 9 m, and 12 m that are subjected to uniformly distributed load over the entire span are examined in this study. The maximum bending moment and Elastic section modulus of Indian Standard Wide Beams (ISWB) after an increase in the width of the flange (if necessary) are grouped and plotted with the help of a C program developed by the authors. The results show that the variation of bending moment with section modulus is parabolic. Also, the rate of increase in load-carrying capacity with respect to section modulus decreases with an increase in the span. However, the increase in the width of the flange results in a lower rate of decrease comparatively.
Keywords:
IS 800 2007, Wide flange beams, Flange width, Proportioning of cross-section, C program.
References:
[1] American Institute of Steel Construction, Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction, pp. 1-2192, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Ashish Goyal, “Comparative Study of IS 800: 2007 Code & IS 800: 1984 Code (General Construction in Steel–Code of Practice),” Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Delhi College of Engineering, pp. 1-149, New-Delhi.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] ASTM A6 / A6M-16a, “Standard Specification for General Requirements for Rolled Structural Steel Bars, Plates, Shapes, and Sheet Piling,” ASTM International, pp. 1-14, 2016.
[Publisher Link]
[4] BS 4-1:1993, “Structural Steel Sections - Part 1: Specification for Hot-Rolled Sections,” British Standard, pp. 1-20, 1993.
[Publisher Link]
[5] BS EN 10025-1:2004, “Hot Rolled Products of Structural Steels - Part 1: General Technical Delivery Conditions,” British Standard, pp. 1-36, 2004.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] BS EN 10162:2003, “Cold Rolled Steel Sections-Technical Delivery Conditions-Dimensional and Cross-Sectional Tolerances,” British Standard, pp. 1-24, 2003.
[Publisher Link]
[7] BS EN 10034:1993, “Structural Steel I and H Sections. Tolerances on Shape and Dimensions,” BS Standards, pp. 1-14, 1993.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] DIN 1025-1, “Hot Rolled I-Sections - Part 1: Narrow Flange I-Sections, I-Series - Dimensions, Masses, Sectional Properties,” DIN Standards, pp. 1-6, 2009.
[Publisher Link]
[9] DIN 1025-2:1995-11, “Hot Rolled I-Beams - Part 2: Wide Flange I-Beams, IPB-Serie; Dimensions, Masses, Sectional Properties,” DIN Standards, pp. 1-3, 1995.
[Publisher Link]
[10] DIN 1025-3:1994-03, “Hot Rolled I-Beams; Wide Flange I-Beams, Light Pattern, IPBl-Serie; Dimensions, Masses, Sectional Properties,” DIN Standards, pp. 1-4, 1994.
[Publisher Link]
[11] DIN 1025-4:1994-03, “Hot Rolled I-Beams; Wide Flange I-Beams Heavy Pattern, IPBv-Serie; Dimensions, Masses, Sectional Properties,” DIN Standards, pp. 1-4, 1994.
[Publisher Link]
[12] DIN 1025-5:1994-03, “Hot Rolled I-Beams; Medium Flange I-Beams, IPE-Serie; Dimensions, Masses, Sectional Properties,” DIN Standards, pp. 1-4, 1994.
[Publisher Link]
[13] Rupen Goswami, Jaswant N. Arlekar, and C.V.R. Murty, “Limitations of Available Indian Hot-Rolled I-Sections for Use in Seismic Steel MRFs,” Report of National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, pp. 1-23, 2006.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Rupen Goswami, Jaswant N. Arlekar, and C.V.R. Murty, “Concerns on Seismic Moment-Shear Connections Using Available Indian Hot-Rolled I-Sections,” Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, pp. 1-16, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Handbook of Steel Construction, Canadian Institute of Steel Construction, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] OneSteel, Hot Rolled and Structural Steel Products, OneSteel, pp. 1-32, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] IMCA, Manual of Steel Construction: Allowable Stress Design, Editorial Limusa SA De CV, pp. 1-400.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] IS 800 1984, “Indian Standard: Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel,” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1-144, 1985.
[Publisher Link]
[19] IS 800 2007, “Indian Standard: General Construction in Steel - Code of Practice,” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1-58, 2007.
[Publisher Link]
[20] IS 808 1989, “Indian Standard: Dimensions for Hot Rolled Steel Beam, Column, Channel and Angle Sections,” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1-20, 1989.
[Publisher Link]
[21] IS 808: 2021, “Hot Rolled Steel Beam Column Channel and Angle Sections - Dimensions and Properties,” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2021.
[Publisher Link]
[22] Kulkarni Swati Ajay, and R. Vesmawala Gaurang, “Suitability of Indian Hot-Rolled Parallel Flange Sections for Use in Seismic Steel Moment Resisting Frames,” International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65-78, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Swati Ajay Kulkarni, and Gaurang Vesmawala, “Parallel Flange I-Beam Sections-Theoretical Study and Finite Element Analysis,” Advances in Structural Engineering, pp. 559-566, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] L.A. Pasnur, and S.S. Patil, “Comparative Study of Beam Using IS: 800-1984& IS: 800-2007,” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 241-243, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] S. Paul, C.V.R. Murty, and S.K. Jain, “Drift-Based Re-Sizing of Steel Frames Including Joint Deformations,” Journal of the Institution of Engineers. India. Civil Engineering Division, vol. 81, pp. 91-100, 2000.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Charles E. Peterson, “Inventing the I-Beam: Richard Turner, Cooper & Hewitt and Others,” Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3-28, 1980.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] SP: 6 (1) – 1964, “Handbook for Structural Engineers: Structural Steel Sections,” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp. 1-212, 1974.
[Publisher Link]
[28] “Structural Sections: To BS4: Part 1: 1993 and BS EN10056: 1999,” Corus Construction & Industrial, Corus, pp. 1-45.
[Publisher Link]