Silence as the Essential Meaning of Sound Experience in Architecture (Case Study: Santa Maria Chapel of Bethlehem, Lembang, West Java)

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2025 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 12 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2025

Authors : Roni Sugiarto, Purnama Salura, Bambang Sugiharto

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I2P110

How to Cite?

Roni Sugiarto, Purnama Salura, Bambang Sugiharto, "Silence as the Essential Meaning of Sound Experience in Architecture (Case Study: Santa Maria Chapel of Bethlehem, Lembang, West Java)," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 12,  no. 2, pp. 97-110, 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V12I2P110

Abstract:

Motivated by the desire to elevate the role of architecture for humans as active participants in the architectural process, this research aims to address the shortcomings of modern architecture, which increasingly becomes objectified. Many architectural products have turned into detached objects, separate from human experience, both bodily and mental. Furthermore, there is a notable loss of sensory experience, particularly auditory experience, as architecture often prioritizes ocular-centrism. Empirically, this phenomenon is prevalent, with architecture frequently imposing itself on its context—like a giant striving to showcase the most dominant form. To counter this obstructive influence, a complementary perspective is required-an experiential lens that incorporates not only visual perception but also auditory experiences. Such an approach seeks to create meaningful, holistic experiences within the spatiality of architecture. Using the case study of the Chapel of Santa Maria of Bethlehem in Lembang, West Java, this research employs a descriptive phenomenological method to uncover the essential meaning of sound experiences as subjectively experienced by humans. This method focuses on exploring and describing how individuals perceive sound in architectural spaces. By achieving the objective of revealing the core essential meaning of sound experiences in architecture, this study contributes to the enrichment of phenomenology in architecture, providing valuable insights for both theoretical exploration and practical application.

Keywords:

Meaning, Sound experience, Architectural phenomenology, Descriptive phenomenology.

References:

[1] J. Pallasmaa, The Eyes of the Skin, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-80, 2005.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Juhani Pallasmaa, Light, Silence, and Spirituality in Architecture and Art, Transcending Architecture, The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 19-32, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Alberto Perez Gomez, “Ethics, Emotion, and Aesthetics: Architecture after the Crisis of Modern Science,” Architecture_MPS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-18, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Alberto Perez Gomez, and Louise Pelletier, Architectural Representation and the Perspective Hinge, MIT Press, pp. 1-505, 1997.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Le Corbusier, Towards a New Architecture, Dover Publications, pp. 1-289, 1986.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Barry Blesser, and Linda-Ruth Salter, Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Experiencing Aural Architecture, MIT Press, pp. 1-456, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Don Ihde, Listening and Voice, Phenomenologies of Sound, 2nd ed., State University of New York Press, pp. 1-276, 2007.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Casey O'Callaghan, and Matthew Nudds, Introduction: The Philosophy of Sounds and Auditory Perception, Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-25, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Casey O'Callaghan, Sounds: A Philosophical Theory, Oxford University Press, 1-208, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Dan Zahavi, Husserl’s Phenomenology, Standford University Press, pp. 1-178, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Effie Heotis, “Phenomenological Research Methods: Extensions of Husserl and Heidegger,” International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120-132, 2020.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, McGill-Queen's University Press, pp. 92-110, 1962.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Helena Dahlberg, “Balancing at the Beginning of Words-Revisiting the Idea of Open Awareness in Qualitative Research,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1019-1026, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Helena Dahlberg, and Karin Dahlberg, “Open and Reflective Lifeworld Research: A Third Way,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 458-464, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Karin Dahlberg, Helena Dahlberg, and Maria Nystrom, Reflective Lifeworld Research, Professional Publishing House, pp. 1-370, 2008.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Helena Dahlberga, and Karin Dahlberg, “The Question of Meaning-A Momentous Issue for Qualitative Research,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Max Van Manen, Phenomenology of Practice Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis, pp. 1-520, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Caroline Jackson, David Roger Vaughan, and Lorraine Brown, “Discovering Lived Experiences through Descriptive Phenomenology,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3309-3325, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Cheryl Tatano Beck, Introduction to Phenomenology Focus on Methodology, Sage Publications, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Emma L. Turley, Surya Monro, and Nigel King, “Doing it Differently: Engaging Interview Participants with Imaginative Variation,” Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 1-10, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Clark Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods, Sage Publications, pp. 1-208, 1994.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Son T.H. Pham, “The Distinctions of Heideggerian Phenomenological Research Method,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 261-273, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] ySarah Elsie Baker, and Rosalind Edwards, “How Many Qualitative Interviews is Enough?,” National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, pp. 1-42, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Amedeo P. Giorgi, and Barbro M. Giorgi, The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method, Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design, American Psychological Association, pp. 243-273, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Gail Sinfield, Sally Goldspink, and Ceri Wilson, “Waiting in the Wings: The Enactment of a Descriptive Phenomenology Study,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1-11, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Katrina Eddles-Hirsch, “Phenomenology and Educational Research,” International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 251-260, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Simon Hoffding, and Kristian Martiny, “Framing a Phenomenological Interview: What, Why and How,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, vol. 15, pp. 539-564, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]