Online Monitoring of Volatile Fatty Acids in Biogas Plants via Data-Driven Software Sensors

International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research
© 2024 by SSRG - IJCER Journal
Volume 11 Issue 1
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Gerardo Lara-Cisneros
pdf
How to Cite?

Gerardo Lara-Cisneros, "Online Monitoring of Volatile Fatty Acids in Biogas Plants via Data-Driven Software Sensors," SSRG International Journal of Chemical Engineering Research, vol. 11,  no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23945370/IJCER-V11I1P101

Abstract:

The Volatile Fatty Acids concentration (VFAs) is a critical component for operating and controlling biogas plants for biomethane production. However, the online monitoring sensors for VFAs are too expensive and require high maintenance costs. This paper proposes data-driven software sensors that can estimate VFAs online from the available online sensor data in biogas plants. From online sensor signals for the temperature, pH, flow rates and biogas composition as inputs and VFAs concentration as the target variable, two approaches are developed: Principal Component Analysis with Nonlinear Support Vector Regression (PCA-NSVR) and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network. The data set was obtained from numerical simulation in the International Water Association (IWA) Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) that includes the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with dynamic influent data and noisy sensor signals. The performance of both software sensors was evaluated via mean-root square error for the testing data set. The results show that the ability of the LSTM recurrent neural network to capture the sequential dynamics in the input data makes this approach more efficient for the online estimation of VFAs.

Keywords:

Biogas plants, Biomethane, Anaerobic Digestion, VFAs estimation, Recurrent neural networks, Support vector regression, Software sensors.

References:

[1] Peter Weiland, “Biogas Production: Current State and Perspectives,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, pp. 849-860, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Quanguo Zhang, Jianjun Hu, and Duu-Jong Lee, “Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion Processes: Research Updates,” Renewable Energy, vol. 98, pp. 108-119, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Daniel Gaida, Christian Wolf, and Michael Bongards, “Feed Control of Anaerobic Digestion Processes for Renewable Energy Production: A Review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 68, pp. 869-875, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Jonathan Hess, and Olivier Bernard, “Design and Study of a Risk Management Criterion for an Unstable Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Process,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 71-79, 2008.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] M. Sbarciog, M. Loccufier, and E. Noldus, “Determination of Appropriate Operation Strategies for Anaerobic Digestion Systems,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 180-188, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Shuiwen Shen et al., “Bifurcation and Stability Analysis of an Anaerobic Digestion Model,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 391-408, 2007.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Denis Dochain, Automatic Control of Bioprocesses, London U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-244, 2008.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Julie Jimenez et al., “Instrumentation and Control of Anaerobic Digestion Processes: A Review and Some Research Challenges,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 615-648, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] G. Lara-Cisneros, D. Dochain, and J. Alvarez-Ramírez, “On-Line Optimization of Biomethane Production in Continuous AD Processes via Model-Based ESC Approach,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1725-1730, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Michael Madsen, Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, and Kim H. Esbensen, “Monitoring of Anaerobic Digestion Processes: A Review Perspective,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3141-3155, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Shunchang Yang et al., “Low-Cost, Arduino-based, Portable Device for Measurement of Methane Composition in Biogas,” Renewable Energy, vol. 138, pp. 224-229, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Jarinah Mohd Ali et al., “Review and Classification of Recent Observers Applied in Chemical Process Systems,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 76, pp. 27-41, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Reiner Luttmann et al., “Soft Sensors in Bioprocessing: A Status Report and Recommendations,” Biotechnology Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1040-1048, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] G. Bastin, On-Line Estimation and Adaptive Control of Bioreactors, Elsevier Science, pp. 1-394, 1991.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Olivier Bernard, Zakaria Hadj-Sadok, and Denis Dochain, “Software Sensors to Monitor the Dynamics of Microbial Communities: Application to Anaerobic Digestion,” Acta Biotheoretica, vol. 48, pp. 197-205, 2000.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Sette Diop, and Ivan Simeonov, “On the Biomass Specific Growth Rates Estimation for Anaerobic Digestion using Differential Algebraic Techniques,” Bioautomation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 47-56, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Boyko Kalchev, Ivan Simeonov, and Nicolai Christov, “Kalman Filter Design for a Second-order Model of Anaerobic Digestion,” International Journal Bioautomation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 85-100, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] D. Gaida et al., “State Estimation for Anaerobic Digesters Using the ADM1,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1088- 1095, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Finn Haugen, Rune Bakke, and Bernt Lie, “State Estimation and Model-based Control of a Pilot Anaerobic Digestion Reactor,” Journal of Control Science and Engineering, vol. 2014, pp. 1-19, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] A. Rodríguez et al., “An Adaptive Observer For Operation Monitoring of Anaerobic Digestion Wastewater Treatment,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 269, pp. 186-193, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] E. Rocha-Cózatl et al., “State and Input Estimation of an Anaerobic Digestion Reactor using a Continuous-Discrete Unknown Input Observer,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 129-134, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Gerardo Lara-Cisneros et al., “On-Line Estimation of VFA Concentration in Anaerobic Digestion via Methane Outflow Rate Measurements,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 94, pp. 250-256, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Laya Das et al., “A Novel Approach to Evaluate State Estimation Approaches for Anaerobic Digester Units Under Modeling Uncertainties: Application to an Industrial Dairy Unit,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 4004-4013, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Gerardo Lara-Cisneros, and Denis Dochain, “Software Sensor for Online Estimation of the VFA’s Concentration in Anaerobic Digestion Processes via a High-Order Sliding Mode Observer,” Industrial and Engineering Chemical Research, vol. 57, pp. 14173-14181, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Laurent Dewasme, Philippe Bogaerts, and Alain Vande Wouwer, “Monitoring of Bioprocesses: Mechanistic and Data-Driven Approaches,” Computational Intelligence Techniques for Bioprocess Modelling, Supervision and Control, Berlin: Springer, pp. 57-97, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Petr Kadlec, Bogdan Gabrys, and Sibylle Strandt, “Data-driven Soft Sensors in the Process Industry,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 795-814, 2009.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Vineet Gopakumar, Sarthak Tiwari, and Imran Rahman, “A Deep Learning Based Data Driven Soft Sensor for Bioprocesses,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 136, pp. 28-39, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Xuemei Wang et al., “Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Models for Online Monitoring of Alkalinity in Anaerobic Co-Digestion System,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 140, pp. 85-92, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] L. Dewasme, “Neural Network-based Software Sensors for the Estimation of Key Components in Brewery Wastewater Anaerobic Digester: An Experimental Validation,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 1975-1985, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Djavan De Clercq et al., “Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Biomethane Production in Industrial-scale Anaerobic Co-Digestion,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 712, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] J. Alex et al., Benchmark Simulation Model no. 2 (BSM2), pp. 1-99, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://iwa-mia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BSM_TG_Tech_Report_no_3_BSM2_General_Description.pdf
[32] D.J. Batstone et al., “The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1),” Water Science & Technology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 66-73, 2002.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Steve R. Gunn, “Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression,” University of Southampton, ISIS Technical Report, 1998.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Felipe L. Gewers et al., “Principal Component Analysis: A Natural Approach to Data Exploration,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1-34, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] M. Alfaro-Ponce, and I. Chairez, “Continuous and Recurrent Pattern Dynamic Neural Networks Recognition of Electrophysiological Signals,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 57, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Wensi Ke et al., “Soft Sensor Development and Applications Based on LSTM in Deep Neural Networks,” IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, pp. 1-6, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Chao Shang et al., “Data-driven Soft Sensor Development Based on Deep Learning Technique,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 223-233, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Sepp Hochreiter, and Jürgen Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, “ADAM: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, 2015.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]