Identifying Access Barriers to Effective Web Resource Retrieval

International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering
© 2016 by SSRG - IJCSE Journal
Volume 3 Issue 5
Year of Publication : 2016
Authors : Y. D. Jayaweera, Md. Gapar Md. Johar

pdf
How to Cite?

Y. D. Jayaweera, Md. Gapar Md. Johar, "Identifying Access Barriers to Effective Web Resource Retrieval," SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering , vol. 3,  no. 5, pp. 14-26, 2016. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488387/IJCSE-V3I5P103

Abstract:

 The Web is used increasingly for informal learning which is more conversation based and learner-centred. Many intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute towards retrieving information on demand. However, Web information retrieval (IR) has proved to be a challenging task due to the rapid increase in quantities of digitised information. Thus, retrieval time and learner attention should receive more emphasis to make Web IR more effective. This study identifies and tests an extended version of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to identify the role of environment factors in effective Web resource usage. The study shows that the presence of environment factors lowers perceived access barriers, leading to more effective usage. Furthermore, the results suggest that extending the TAM to include perceived access barriers helps to explain the existence and application of intrinsic motivation factors leading to effective usage, providing key insights for website designers to re-evaluate their processes to incorporate environment factors.

Keywords:

context awareness, web information retrieval, learning, technology acceptance model.

References:

[1] I. Ajzen, ―The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179–211, 1991.
[2] J. Allan, J. Aslam, N. Belkin, C. Buckley, J. Callan, B. Croft and C. Zhai, ―Challenges in information retrieval and language modeling: report of a workshop held at the center for intelligent information retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst, September 2002. In ACM SIGIR Forum, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 31-47, April, 2003.
[3] N. S. Aziz & A. Kamaludin, "Assessing website usability attributes using partial least squares. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering 4, no. 2 (2014): 137.
[4] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, ―How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 206-230, 2004.
[5] S. Y. Chen and R. D. Macredie, "Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation development of a learning model,"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3–15, 2002.
[6] M. Cooper, C. Colwell and A. Jelfs, ―Embedding accessibility and usability: considerations for e-learning research and development projects, In ALT-J, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 231 – 245, September, 2007.
[7] F. Davis, ―Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13 (3), pp. 319–340, 1989.
[8] F. D. Davis and V. Venkatesh, ―Toward pre-prototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 (1), pp. 31–46, 2004.
[9] A. Edmunds and A. Morris, ―The problem of information overload in business organisations: a review of the literature, Int. J. of Information Management, pp. 17-28, 2000.
[10] N.D. Fleming, ―A Guide to Learning Styles: VARK strategies, Available from: http://www.varklearn. com/english/page.asp?p=questionnaire.[Accessed Jan 23, 2015]
[11] M. Furini, S. Montangero: "SIWeb: understanding the Interests of the Society through Web data Analysis", Open Journal of Web Technologies (OJWT), 1 (1), Pages 1-14, RonPub. [Online]: http://www.ronpub.com/ publications/ojwt/OJWT-v1i1n01_Furini.html
[12] J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
[13] D.L. Hoffman and T.P. Novak, ―Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations, The Journal of Marketing, pp. 50-68, 1996.
[14] H. Holden and R. Rada, ―Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), pp.343-367, 2011.
[15] Y. Lee and K. A. Kozar, ―Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision support systems, 52(2), pp.450-463,2012.
[16] M.W. Matlin, ―Cognitive psychology and college-level pedagogy: Two siblings that rarely communicate, In D. F. Halpern, & M. D. Hakel (Eds.), Applying the science of learning to university teaching and beyond, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 87-103, 2002.
[17] J. Neilsen, ―Usability 101: Introduction to Usability, Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox of 25 August 2003, accessed on 6 February 2016 at http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html
[18] J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory (2nd ed.),New York: McGraw-Hill,1978
[19] C.E. Porter and N. Donthu, ―Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics, Journal of business research, 59(9), 999-1007, 2006.
[20] D. E. Rose and D. Levinson, ―Understanding user goals in Web search, In Proceedings of WWW 2004, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press, pp. 13-19, 2004.
[21] B. Saini, V. Singh and S. Kumar, "Information Retrieval Models And Searching Methodologies: Survey," Information Retrieval, 1(2), 2014.
[22] T. Sathiyabama and K. Vivekanandan, "Personalized Web Search Techniques -A Review," Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume 11 Issue 12 Version 1.0 July 2011.
[23] B. Shackel, "Usability – context, framework, definition, design and evaluation," Interacting with Computers, vol. 21, no. 5-6, pp. 339–346, Dec. 2009.
[24] C.R. Tseng, H.C. Chu, G.J. Hwang, and C.C. Tsai, ―Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information, Computers and Education, 51(2), pp. 776–786, 2008.
[25] "UX Design Defined - User Experience - UX Design". Uxdesign.com. N.p., 2016. Web. 10 Apr. 2016.
[26] S. Wheeler, "Learning space mashups: combining Web 2.0 tools to create collaborative and reflective learning spaces." Future internet 1, no. 1, pp. 3-13, 2009.
[27] Q. Yang, H.F. Wang, J. R. Wen, G. Zhang, Y. Lu, K.F. Lee and H.J. Zhang, ―Towards a next-generation search engine, In PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 5-15, 2000.