A Novel Organizational Framework for Software Process

International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering

© 2017 by SSRG - IJCSE Journal

Volume 4 Issue 6

Year of Publication : 2017

Authors : M. Suganya, Dr. K. Alagarsamy

10.14445/23488387/IJCSE-V4I6P109

How to Cite?

M. Suganya, Dr. K. Alagarsamy, " A Novel Organizational Framework for Software Process," SSRG International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering , vol. 4,  no. 6, pp. 49-51, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488387/IJCSE-V4I6P109

Abstract:

 The Capability Maturity Model for Softwareis anorganizational framework which explains the key feature’s for an effective software process. Software engineering is a managerial andengineering process for the development of highquality software with certified reliability. Thecompilation of CMM, organizationalpotentials, judicious application oftechnical practices represents a powerfulprocess improvement.This paper stresses the need of organizational framework for developing and maintaining the software process and proposed a novel organizational framework for small and medium scale enterprise to improve the software process.

Keywords:

CMM, Software process, Organizational Framework.

References:

[1] Z. Y. Zhou, ―CMM in uncertain environments, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 8–27, August 2004.
[2] Mishra,A., Mishra, D. (2006), Software Quality Assurance Models in Small and Medium Organisations: a Comparison. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 5(1): 4-20.
[3] Gerogiannis, V. C. & Ipsilandis, P. G. (2007), Multi Objective Analysis for Timeboxing Models of Software Development. Proceedings of the 2nd ICSOFT Conference (International Conference on Software and Data Technologies), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 145-153.
[4] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, ―Interaction management and its application, International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.25–32, March 2005.
[5] J. P. Wan and J. Z. Li, ―Some considerations on knowl-edge management in software enterprise, Application Research of Computer, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 13–16, Janu-ary 2003. (in Chinese)
[6] J. Z. Li and J. P. Wan, ―Considerations on project management in small and middle software organization, Application Research of Computer, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 14–17, September 2003. (in Chinese)
[7] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, ―Research on the complexity of software process improvement, In Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, Moscow, USA, pp. 168–172, August 15-17, 2003.
[8] J. P. Wan, J. M. Yang, and H. Y. Han, ―Support structure of knowledge management in software process improve-ment, In Information Systems: e-business Challenge, IFIP 17th World Computer Conference, Montreal, Can-ada, pp. 17–29, August 25-30, 2002.
[9] Niazi, M., Wilson, D. ,Zowghi, D. (2006), Critical Success Factors for Software Process Improvement Implementation: An Empirical Study. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 11(2):193–211.
[10] Gerogiannis, V. C., Kakarontzas, G., Stamelos, I. (2006), A Unified Approach for Software Process Representation and Analysis.
[11] Proceedings of the 1st ICSOFT Conference (International Conference on Software and Data Technologies), Setubal, Portugal, pp.127-132.
[12] J. P. Wan and Y. L. Zhuo, ―The e-business challenge, Application Research of Computer, Vol. 20, No. 9, pp. 9–10, September 2003. (in Chinese)
[13] J. N. Warfield and A. R. Cardenas, ―A handbook of interactive management, AJAR Publishing Company, 1994.
[14] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, ―On the meanings of complex-ity, generic design science and work program of com-plexity, Journal of Systemic Dialectics, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 41–44, December 2002. (in Chinese)
[15] Z. T. Wang, Knowledge Systems Engineering, Beijing, Science Press, 2004. (in Chinese)
[16] Z. Y. Cheng and C. Theory, The Management Philosophy of China, Shanghai, XueLin Press, Vol. 315, 1999. (in Chinese) [17] W. S. Humphrey, ―Managing the software process, Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 19–24, 1989.
[18] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, ―Knowledge management in software process improvement, Application Research of Computer, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 1–3, May 2002. (in Chi-nese)
[19] J. D. Herbsleb and D. R. Goldenson, ―A systematic sur-vey of CMM experience and results, in Proceedings 18th Intennational Conference on Software Engineering, Ber-lin, Germany, pp. 323–330, March 1996.
[20] R. S. Pressman, ―Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach, Vol. 5, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., pp. 19, 2001.
[21] IkujiroNonaka and Georg von Krogh, ―Perspective— Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 635–652, 2009.
[22] J. N. Warfield, ―A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design, IOWA State University, pp. 142–146, 187–188, 1994.
[23] J. P. Wan and J. M. Yang, ―Research on the work pro-gram of complexity of software process improve-ment— Methodology for implementation of SW-CMM, Science Press, Beijing, 2004. (in Chinese)
[24] J. N. Warfield, ―Twenty laws of complexity: Science applicable in organizations, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 3–40, 1999.
[25] M. Scott and J. N. Warfield, ―Enterprise integration of product development data: Systems science in action, Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 269– 285, August 2007.
[26] J. N. Warfield, ―Understanding complexity: Thought and behavior, AJAR Publishing Company, 2002.
[27] Brooks and P. Frederick, ―No silver bullet: Essence and accidents of software engineering, Computer, Vol. 20, pp. 10–19, April 1987.
[28] B. W. Boehm, ―Seven basic principles of software engineering,‖ Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 3, pp. 3–24, March 1983.
[29] J. N. Warfield, ―Mentomology: The identification and classification of mindbugs, http://mars.gmu.edu:8080/ dspace/bitstream/1920/3199/1/Warfield%20_20_20_A1b.pdf , 1995.
[30] Nonaka and Ikjurio, ―Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 14–36, 1994.