Simulating Wavelength Converter to reduce Call Blocking
International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering |
© 2014 by SSRG - IJECE Journal |
Volume 1 Issue 9 |
Year of Publication : 2014 |
Authors : P.D.Yadav and Shilpa Gaikwad |
How to Cite?
P.D.Yadav and Shilpa Gaikwad, "Simulating Wavelength Converter to reduce Call Blocking," SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 15-20, 2014. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V1I9P105
Abstract:
In this paper wavelength converter is demonstrated to reduce call blocking. When a light path is established same wavelength has to be allocated on all the fibre links, this is wavelength continuity constraint. To overcome this constraint, wavelength converter is used. This paper gives the performance of the network in terms of blocking probability, throughput, and grade of service, for no wavelength conversion, sparse partial wavelength conversion and full wavelength conversion. It also shows that the performance of sparse partial wavelength conversion is closer to full wavelength conversion. Thus this reduces the number of wavelength converters and makes the conversion more cost effective.
Keywords:
wavelength converter, wavelength continuity constraint, call blocking, sparse partial wavelength conversion.
References:
[1] C. M. Assi, A. A. Shami, M. A. Ali, Z. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Impact of Wavelength Converters on the Performance of Optical Networks,”SPIE/Kluwer Optical Networks Magazine, Vol. 3, No. 2, pages 22-30,March/April 2002.
[2] A. Birman, “Computing Approximate Blocking Probabilities for a Class of All-Optical Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 14, No. 5, pages 852-857, June 1996.
[3] I. Chlamtac, A. Ganz, and G. Karmi, “Lightpath Communications: An Approach to High Bandwidth Optical WAN's,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 40, No. 7, pages 1171-1182, July 1992.
[4] X. W. Chu, B. Li, and I. Chlamtac, “Wavelength Converter Placement under Different RWA Algorithm in Wavelength-Routed All-Optical Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 51, No. 4, pages 607-617, April 2003.
[5] H. Harai, M. Murata, and H. Miyahara, “Heuristic Algorithms of Allocation of Wavelength Convertible Nodes and Routing Coordination in All-Optical Networks”, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, pages 535-545, April 1999.
[6] F. P. Kelly, “Blocking probabilities in large circuit-switched networks,” Advances in Applied Probability, Vol. 18, pages 473-505, 1986.
[7] M. Kovacevic and A. Acampora, “Benefits of Wavelength Translation in All-Optical Clear-Channel Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 14, No. 5, pages 868-880, June 1996.
[8] K. Lee and V. Li, “A Wavelength-Convertible Optical Network,” IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 11, No. 5/6, pages 962-970, May/June 1993.
[9] R. Ramaswami and K. Sivarajan, “Routing and Wavelength Assignment in All-Optical Networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 3, No. 5, pages 489-500, October 1995.
[10] S. Subramaniam, M. Azizoglu, and A. K. Somani, “All-Optical Networks with Sparse Wavelength Conversion,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 4, No. 4, pages 544-557, August 1996.
[11] S. Subramaniam, M. Azizoglu, and A. K. Somani, “On Optimal Converter Placement in Wavelength-Routed Networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 5, pages 754-767, October 1999.
[12] K. R. Venugopal, M. Shivakumar, and P. S. Kumar, “A Heuristic for Placement of Limited Range Wavelength Converters in All-Optical Networks,” In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM'99, pages 908-915, March 1999.
[13] G. Xiao and Y. W. Leung, “Algorithms for Allocating Wavelength Converters in All-Optical Networks,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 7, No. 4, pages 545-557, August 1999.
[14] Y. Zhu, G. N. Rouskas, and H. G. Perros, “A Comparison of Allocation Policies in Wavelength Routing Networks,” Photonic Networks Communication Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, pages 265-293, August