Estimation of Loss Probability and Path Loss for 5G Millimeter-Wave Communication using 5G NR Path Loss Model
International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering |
© 2024 by SSRG - IJECE Journal |
Volume 11 Issue 10 |
Year of Publication : 2024 |
Authors : Abhishek Madankar, Atish Khobragade, Minal Patil, Shital Telrande |
How to Cite?
Abhishek Madankar, Atish Khobragade, Minal Patil, Shital Telrande, "Estimation of Loss Probability and Path Loss for 5G Millimeter-Wave Communication using 5G NR Path Loss Model," SSRG International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 35-42, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V11I10P103
Abstract:
The performance characteristics of the 5G wireless communication system, which is recently undergoing more extensive development in the mmWave frequency range, are summarized in the research. The earliest research results with fundamental concepts of networks in networks are presented here, together with an account of the international efforts undertaken to mimic the channels for applications that are licensed and those that are not. Path Loss and LOS probability for several standards bodies, including (LOS), which represents line-of-sight, and NLOS, which represents non-line-of-sight probabilities, have been compared for a 28 GHz frequency range. For the 3GPP model Umi LOS Scenario, the path loss obtained is 105 dB and 70 dB for 200m with ABG and 5G NR model. The path losses obtained for the 3GPP Umi NLOS Scenario are 138 dB and 120 dB for 200m with ABG and 5G NR model. So, path loss for both scenarios is better with the 5GNR model. The loss probability obtained for the 3GPP Umi LOS Scenario is 0.093622 and 0.093518 for 200m with ABG and 5G NR model. For the 3GPP Umi NLOS Scenario, the improvability in loss probability obtained is 0.133333 and 0.128048 for 200m with the ABG and 5G NR models. So, the loss probability for both scenarios is enhanced with the 5GNR model.
Keywords:
LOS probability, Reference channel models, Millimeter wave, Delay, 5GNR, 3GPP, (5G)fifth generation Path loss.
References:
[1] Zakria Qadir et al., “Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Use Cases, and Open Challenges,” ICT Express, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 296-312, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Shimaa A. Abdel Hakeem, Hanan H. Hussein, and HyungWon Kim, “Vision and Research Directions of 6G Technologies and Applications,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 2419-2442, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Agbotiname Lucky Imoize et al., “Standard Propagation Channel Models for MIMO Communication Systems,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 1-36, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Shu Sun et al., “Propagation Models and Performance Evaluation for 5G Millimeter-Wave Bands,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 8422-8439, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Nicholas O. Oyie, and Thomas J.O. Afullo, “Spatiotemporal Statistical Channel Model for Indoor Corridor at 14 GHz, 18 GHz, and 22 GHz Bands,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2018, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Mohammed Bahjat Majed et al., “Channel Characterization and Path Loss Modeling in Indoor Environment at 4.5, 28, and 38 GHz for 5G Cellular Networks,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2018, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Zahera Naseem, Iram Nausheen, and Zahwa Mirza, “Propagation Models for Wireless Communication System,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 237-242, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] ETSI TR 138 901, “Study on Channel Model for Frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (3GPP TR 38.901 Version 14.0.0 Release 14),” 3GPP, Technical Report, pp. 1-90, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Katsuyuki Haneda et al., “Indoor 5G 3GPP-like Channel Models for Office and Shopping Mall Environments,” 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 694-699, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] “5G Channel Model for Bands up to 100 GHz,” IEEE Workshop on 5.5G &6G from Huawei, Technical Report, pp. 1-56, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Katsuyuki Haneda et al., “5G 3GPP-Like Channel Models for Outdoor Urban Microcellular and Macrocellular Environments,” 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Nanjing, China, pp. 1-7, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Ana Katalinić, and Radovan Zentner, “Reference Channel Models: Classification and Implementation Challenges,” 2010 Conference Proceedings ICECom, 20th International Conference on Applied Electromagnetics and Communications, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 1-4, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]