Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Services for Secure and Transparent Data Management in SMEs

International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
© 2024 by SSRG - IJEEE Journal
Volume 11 Issue 9
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : Abdifatah Farah Ali, Rusli Haji Abdullah, Abdikarim Abi Hassan, Husein Osman Abdullahi, Mohamud Ahmed Mohamed
pdf
How to Cite?

Abdifatah Farah Ali, Rusli Haji Abdullah, Abdikarim Abi Hassan, Husein Osman Abdullahi, Mohamud Ahmed Mohamed, "Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Services for Secure and Transparent Data Management in SMEs," SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 9, pp. 240-249, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I9P122

Abstract:

This research investigates the key factors affecting the intention of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to adopt blockchain-based cloud services. The aim is to design sustainable and effective business ecosystems. The study refines the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to develop a theoretical framework. This framework evaluates how various factors, such as Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Trust (TR), and Security Concerns (SC), influence the Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt blockchain-enabled cloud services. To achieve the research objectives, data were collected via an online questionnaire. A total of 273 valid responses from small enterprises in Somalia were collected and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Empirical evidence indicates that the independent constructs PE, FC, SI, TR, SC, and BI are positively associated. The integration of Security Concerns (SC) and Trust (TR) concepts adds a significant contribution to the existing body of knowledge. The study's outcomes are particularly important for SMEs, offering valuable insights into encouraging technology adoption for sustainable and successful innovation.

Keywords:

Blockchain, Cloud services, Data security, SMEs, UTAUT.

References:

[1] Wenyu (Derek) Du et al., “Affordances, Experimentation and Actualization of FinTech: A Blockchain Implementation Study,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 50-65, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Svein Ølnes, Jolien Ubacht, and Marijn Janssen, “Blockchain in Government: Benefits and Implications of Distributed Ledger Technology for Information Sharing,” vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 355-364, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Nir Kshetri, “1 Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 39, pp. 80-89, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Robleh Ali et al., “Innovations in Payment Technologies and the Emergence of Digital Currencies,” Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, pp. 262-275, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Svetlana Abramova, and Rainer Bohme, “Perceived Benefit and Risk as Multidimensional Determinants of Bitcoin Use: A Quantitative Exploratory Study,” Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-20, 2016.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Elena Karafiloski, and Anastas Mishev, “Blockchain Solutions for Big Data Challenges: A Literature Review,” IEEE EUROCON 2017-17th International Conference on Smart Technologies, Ohrid, Macedonia, pp. 763-768, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Dimitris Mourtzis, and Ekaterini Vlachou, “Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems and Quality of Services,” The TQM Journal, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 704-733, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Md. Tanzim Khorshed, A.B.M. Shawkat Ali, and Saleh A. Wasimi, “A Survey on Gaps, Threat Remediation Challenges and Some Thoughts for Proactive Attack Detection in Cloud Computing,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 833-851, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Sen Liu et al., “The Business Value of Cloud Computing: The Partnering Agility Perspective,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 1160-1177, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Mohsen Attaran, and Jeremy Woods, “Cloud Computing Technology: Improving Small Business Performance Using the Internet,” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 495-519, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Juho Lindman, Matti Rossi, and Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen, “Opportunities and Risks of Blockchain Technologies-A Research Agenda,” Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1533-1542, 2017.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Roman Beck, Christoph Müller-Bloch, and John Leslie King, “Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1020-1034, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Guoqing Zhao et al., “Blockchain Technology in Agri-Food Value Chain Management: A Synthesis of Applications, Challenges and Future Research Directions,” Computers in Industry, vol. 109, pp. 83-99, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Ifeyinwa Juliet Orji et al., “Evaluating the Factors that Influence Blockchain Adoption in the Freight Logistics Industry,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 141, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Martin Haferkorn, and Josué Manuel Quintana Diaz, “Seasonality and Interconnectivity within Cryptocurrencies-An Analysis on the Basis of Bitcoin, Litecoin and Namecoin,” Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry, Sydney, Australia, pp. 106-120, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Yingli Wang et al., “Making Sense of Blockchain Technology: How will it Transform Supply Chains?,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 211, pp. 221-236, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Matti Rossi et al., “Blockchain Research in Information Systems: Current Trends and an Inclusive Future Research Agenda,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1390-1405, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Grand View Research, Blockchain Technology Market to Reach $1,431.54 Billion by 2030, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-blockchain-technology-market
[19] Sonia Shahzadi et al., “Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): A Comparative Performance Analysis of Open-Source Cloud Platforms,” 2017 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), Lund, Sweden, pp. 1-6, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Ravi Seethamraju, “Adoption of Software as a Service (SaaS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs),” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 475-492, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Robail Yasrab, “Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS): The Next Hype of Cloud Computing,” arXiv Preprint, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Sujeet Kumar Sharma et al., “Predicting Motivators of Cloud Computing Adoption: A Developing Country Perspective,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 62, pp. 61-69, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Jiunn-Woei Lian, David C. Yen, and Yen-Ting Wang, “An Exploratory Study to Understand the Critical Factors Affecting the Decision to Adopt Cloud Computing in Taiwan Hospital,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 28-36, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Fred D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Viswanath Venkatesh et al., “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Tsai-Hsuan Tsai et al., “Technology Anxiety and Resistance to Change Behavioral Study of a Wearable Cardiac Warming System Using an Extended TAM for Older Adults,” PloS One, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Alistair Brandon-Jones, and Katri Kauppi, “Examining the Antecedents of the Technology Acceptance Model within e-Procurement,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 22-42, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Hamed Khazaei, “Integrating Cognitive Antecedents to UTAUT Model to Explain Adoption of Blockchain Technology among Malaysian SMEs,” JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85-90, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Alexios Vasileiadis, “Security Concerns and Trust in the Adoption of m-Commerce,” SocialinÄ—s Technologijos, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 179-191, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Vikram Sadhya, and Harshali Sadhya, “Barriers to Adoption of Blockchain Technology,” Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1-10, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Mohammad Rokibul Kabir, “Behavioural Intention to Adopt Blockchain for a Transparent and Effective Taxing System,” Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 170-201, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Paul A. Pavlou, Yao-Hua Tan, and David Gefen, “Institutional Trust and Familiarity in Online Interorganizational Relationships,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Naples, Italy, 2003.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Jacob Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York, 1988.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, and Joseph F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling,” Handbook of Market Research, pp. 587-632, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Yan Piaw Chua, A Step-by-Step Guide PLS-SEM Data Analysis Using SmartPLS 4, 2022. "
[Google Scholar]
[36] Christian M. Ringle et al., “A Perspective on Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling in Data Articles,” Data in Brief, vol. 48, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Jorg Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt, “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, pp. 115-135, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Wynne W. Chin, “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling,” Modern Methods for Business Research, 1st ed., Psychology Press, 1998.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Claes Fornell, and David F. Larcker, “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 382-388, 1981.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Joseph F. Hair et al., Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), OmniaScience Scholar, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Vincenzo Esposito Vinzi, Laura Trinchera, and Silvano Amato, “PLS Path Modeling: From Foundations to Recent Developments and Open Issues for Model Assessment and Improvement,” Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 47-82, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] R. Frank Falk, and Nancy B. Miller, A Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press, 1992.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]