Hybrid Intelligent Routing with Optimized Learning (HIROL) for Adaptive Routing Topology management in FANETs
International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering |
© 2024 by SSRG - IJEEE Journal |
Volume 11 Issue 11 |
Year of Publication : 2024 |
Authors : Ch. Naveen Kumar Reddy, M. Anusha |
How to Cite?
Ch. Naveen Kumar Reddy, M. Anusha, "Hybrid Intelligent Routing with Optimized Learning (HIROL) for Adaptive Routing Topology management in FANETs," SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 30-43, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I11P104
Abstract:
Enhancing the routing efficacy of Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs), a network of numerous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), in which various challenges may arise as a result of the varied mobility, speed, direction, and rapid topology changes. Given the special features of UAVs, particularly their fast mobility, frequent topology changes, and 3D space movements, it is difficult to transport them through a FANET. The suggested study presents a complete hybrid model: Hybrid Intelligent Routing with Optimized Learning (HIROL) that integrates the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm, DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) by incorporating Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to optimize the routing process. The HIROL optimizes link management using the ABC optimization algorithm and reliably analyses link status using characteristics from OLSR and DSR; at the same time, an ANN-based technique successfully classifies the connection state. In order to provide optimal route design and maintenance, HIROL dynamically migrates between OLSR and DSR approaches according to the network topology conditions. After running thorough tests in Network Simulator 2 (NS-2), when compared to more conventional DSR and OLSR models, the hybrid model HIROL performs far better in simulations and tests. An increase in throughput (3.5 Mbps vs. 3.2-3.4 Mbps), a decrease in communication overhead (15% vs. 18-20%), and an improvement in Packet Delivery Ratio (97.5% vs. 94-95.5%). These results demonstrate that the suggested HIROL model improves FANET routing performance in different types of networks.
Keywords:
Artificial bee colony, Artificial Neural Network, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, FANETs, Hybrid intelligent routing.
References:
[1] T. Rehannara Beegum et al., “Optimized Routing of UAVs Using Bio-Inspired Algorithm in FANET: A Systematic Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 15588-15622, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Venkata Ramana K. et al., “Optimizing 6G Network Slicing with the EvoNetSlice Model for Dynamic Resource Allocation and Real-Time QoS Management”, International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 325-340, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Min Zhang et al., “Adaptive Routing Design for Flying Ad Hoc Networks: A Joint Prediction Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 2593-2604, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] M. Usha et al., “EOEEORFP: Eagle Optimized Energy Efficient Optimal Route-Finding Protocol for Secure Data Transmission in FANETs,” IETE Journal of Research, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 4867-4879, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Syed Agha Hassnain Mohsan et al., “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Practical Aspects, Applications, Open Challenges, Security Issues, and Future Trends,” Intelligent Service Robotics, vo. 16, pp. 109-137, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Ali H. Waheeb et al., “Performance Evaluation of Standard and Modified OLSR protocols for Uncoordinated UAV Ad-Hoc Networks in Search and Reuse Environments,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 6, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] Penghui Hu et al., “A Dynamic and Local Perspective: A Reliable Q-Routing Protocol Based on Fuzzy Logic for FANETs,” 2023 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), Dalian, China, pp. 1-6, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Anthony Olufemi Tesimi Adeyemi-Ejeye et al., “Ultra-High-Definition Video Transmission for Mission-Critical Communication Systems Applications,” Multimedia Services and Applications in Mission Critical Communication Systems, pp. 115-130, 2017.
[Google Scholar]
[9] Omar Sami Oubbati et al., “Routing in Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Survey, Constraints, and Future Challenge Perspectives,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 81057-81105, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Muhammad Asghar Khan et al., “Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A Review of Communication Architectures, and Routing Protocols,” 2017 First International Conference on Latest Trends in Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (INTELLECT), Karachi, Pakistan, 2017, pp. 1-9.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] M. Sri Lakshmi et al., “Evaluating the Isolation Forest Method for Anomaly Detection in Software-Defined Networking Security,” Journal of Electrical Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 279-297, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Alexey V. Leonov, and George A. Litvinov, “Considering AODV and OLSR Routing Protocols to Traffic Monitoring Scenario in FANET Formed by Mini-UAVs,” XIV International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering, Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 229-237, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Stefano Rosati et al., “Dynamic Routing for Flying Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1690-1700, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Danial Javaheri, Alireza Gilani, and Ali Ghaffari, “Energy-Efficient Routing in IoT Networks with ABC Optimization and Machine Learning for Smart City Infrastructure”, Frontires in Collaborative Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-13, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Alexey V. Leonov, and George A. Litvinov, “About Applying AODV and OLSR Routing Protocols to Relaying Network Scenario in FANET with Mini-UAVs,” 2018 XIV International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering (APEIE), Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 220-228, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Zhongqiang Zhai, Jun Du, and Yong Ren, “The Application and Improvement of Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm in Swarm Network with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Nodes,” The Ninth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, pp. 7-12, 2013.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Vijay Walunj, Diego Marcilio, and Bhaveet Nagaria, “Dynamic Congestion Control Mechanisms for Enhanced Efficiency in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks”, International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 24-32, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[18] Liang Zhao et al., “A Novel Improved Artificial Bee Colony and Blockchain-Based Secure Clustering Routing Scheme for FANET,” China Communications, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 103-116, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Lin Lin et al., “A Novel Geographic Position Mobility Oriented Routing Strategy for UAVs,” Journal of Computational Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 709-716, 2012.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Wajiya Zafar, and Bilal Muhammad Khan, “A Reliable, Delay-Bounded and Less Complex Communication Protocol for Multicluster FANETs,” Digital Communications and Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30-38, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Ahmed M. Khedr, and Pravija Raj P.V., “A Hybrid MGO-JAYA Based Clustered Routing for FANETs,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 45, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Zhigao Zheng, Arun Kumar Sangaiah, and Tao Wang, “Adaptive Communication Protocols in Flying Ad Hoc Network,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 136-142, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Ganbayar Gankhuyag, Anish Prasad Shrestha, and Sang-Jo Yoo, “Robust and Reliable Predictive Routing Strategy for Flying Ad-Hoc Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 643-654, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Gokhan Secinti et al., “SDNs in the Sky: Robust End-to-End Connectivity for Aerial Vehicular Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 16-21, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Murad Khan, Ibrahim Shayea, and Joel J.P.C. Rodrigues, “Adaptive Hybrid Routing for Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks Using Swarm Intelligence and Neural Network-Based Traffic Prediction”, International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 13-23, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[26] Fuhui Zhou, Thomas Lagkas, and Farhan Aadil, “Optimizing Edge Computing for Internet of Drones: A Hybrid Approach Using Deep Learning and Swarm-Based Routing”, Macaw International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 64-73, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Omar Sami Oubbati, Adnan Shahid Khan, and Madhusanka Liyanage, “Blockchain-Enhanced Secure Routing in FANETs: Integrating ABC Algorithms and Neural Networks for Attack Mitigation”, Synthesis: A Multidisciplinary Research Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] M. Sri Lakshmi et al., “Dynamic Spam Detection in Social Networks: Leveraging Convex Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Enhanced Accuracy and Scalability”, International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1-11, 2024.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]