A Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor System Using Optical Sensors for Efficient Air Pollution Monitoring

International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

© 2024 by SSRG - IJEEE Journal

Volume 11 Issue 12

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : Kalali Das, Sagnik Ghosh, Himadri Sekhar Dutta

10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I12P102

How to Cite?

Kalali Das, Sagnik Ghosh, Himadri Sekhar Dutta, "A Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensor System Using Optical Sensors for Efficient Air Pollution Monitoring," SSRG International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 12, pp. 11-25, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488379/IJEEE-V11I12P102

Abstract:

Air pollution is a significant societal concern as it can have profound health implications, leading to illnesses and even fatalities among individuals. Particulate Matter (PM), a common form of air pollution, is known to be particularly harmful, contributing to heart and respiratory issues. This research addresses the issue of air pollution, specifically the health risks associated with Particulate Matter (PM2.5). The study aims to establish baseline PM2.5 concentration levels, an essential step toward enhancing air quality standards, particularly in developing countries. This study introduces a novel and economical detection approach that leverages readily accessible sensors backed by comprehensive data gathered from diverse settings in West Bengal. The system aims to precisely assess PM levels in different conditions using digital signal processing methods to reduce noise and maintain reliable calibration. This research highlights the commitment to addressing air pollution and demonstrates the approach's effectiveness through detailed experimental analysis. This work can significantly contribute to creating safer, healthier environments globally.

Keywords:

Air pollution, Optical PM sensors, Low-cost PM sensor system, Digital signal processing, Air quality.

References:

[1] Juliana P. Sá et al., “Application of the Low-Cost Sensing Technology for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: A Review,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 28, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Jagriti Saini, Maitreyee Dutta, and Gonçalo Marques, “A Comprehensive Review on Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems for Enhanced Public Health,” Sustainable Environment Research, vol. 30, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Mohammad H. Forouzanfar et al., “Global, Regional, and National Comparative Risk Assessment of 79 Behavioural, Environmental and Occupational, and Metabolic Risks or Clusters of Risks in 188 Countries, 1990-2013: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 10010, pp. 2287-2323, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] World Health Organization, Burden of Disease from Household Air Pollution for 2012, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccacoalition.org/resources/world-health-organization-burden-disease-joint-effects-household-and-ambient-air
[5] Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Global Burden of Disease (GBDx Results Tool). [Online]. Available: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool
[6] Hannah Ritchie, and Max Roser, “Indoor Air Pollution,” Our World in Data, 2014.
[Publisher Link]
[7] Stephen S. Lim et al., “A Comparative Risk Assessment of Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor Clusters in 21 Regions,1990-2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2224-2260, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Barbara A. Maher et al., “Magnetite Pollution Nanoparticles in the Human Brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 39, pp. 10797-10801, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] World Health Organization, Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health (PHE) during the Seventieth World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2017/05/22/default-calendar/public-health-environmental-and-social-determinants-of-health-(phe)-during-the-70th-world-health-assembly
[10] Hyuntae Cho, “Personal Environmental Monitoring System and Network Platform,” 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 751-756, 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Jonathan O. Anderson, Josef G. Thundiyil, and Andrew Stolbach, “Clearing the Air: A Review of the Effects of Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Human Health,” Journal of Medical Toxicology, vol. 8, pp. 166-175, 2012.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] George F. Fine et al., “Metal Oxide Semi-Conductor Gas Sensors in Environmental Monitoring,” Sensors, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5469-5502, 2010.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Brigida Alfano et al., “A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Amara L. Holder et al., “Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors for Measuring Wildfire Smoke,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 17, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] Hoochang Lee et al., “Long-Term Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 13, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Erika Brattich et al., “How to Get the Best from Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors: Guidelines and Practical Recommendations,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Steven J. Johnston et al., “City Scale Particulate Matter Monitoring Using LoRaWAN Based Air Quality IoT Devices,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Sara Zanni et al., “Indoor Air Quality Real-Time Monitoring in Airport Terminal Areas: An Opportunity for Sustainable Management of Micro-Climatic Parameters,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 11, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Andrea Di Antonio et al., “Developing a Relative Humidity Correction for Low-Cost Sensors Measuring Ambient Particulate Matter,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 9, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Stephen Reece et al., “Spatial-Temporal Analysis of PM2.5 and NO2 Concentrations Collected Using Low-Cost Sensors in Peñuelas, Puerto Rico,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 12, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Shaohua Hu et al., “Evaluation of Gravimetric Method to Measure Light-Duty Vehicle Particulate Matter Emissions at Levels below One Milligram per Mile (1 mg/mile),” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1571, 2014.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] So Eun Shin, Chang Hoon Jung, and Yong Pyo Kim, “Analysis of the Measurement Difference for the PM10 Concentrations between Beta-Ray Absorption and Gravimetric Methods at Gosan,” Aerosol and Air Quality Research, vol. 11, pp. 846-853, 2011.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Harvey Patashnick, and Erich G. Rupprecht, “Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1079-1083, 1991.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Karoline K. Johnson et al., “Using Low Cost Sensors to Measure Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations and On-Road Emissions Factors,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 2016.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Sinan Sousan, Swastika Regmi, and Yoo Min Park, “Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Parcle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 12, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Janani Venkatraman Jagatha et al., “Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 12, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Martha Arbayani Zaidan et al., “Intelligent Calibration and Virtual Sensing for Integrated Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 13638-13652, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] S.K. Sharma, and T.K. Mandal, “Elemental Composition and Sources of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in Delhi, India,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 110, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Georgia Miskell, Jennifer A. Salmond, and David E. Williams, “Solution to the Problem of Calibration of Low-Cost Air Quality Measurement Sensors in Networks,” ACS Sensors, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 832-843, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] Mariusz Rogulski, and Artur Badyda, “Investigation of Low-Cost and Optical Particulate Matter Sensors for Ambient Monitoring,” Atmosphere, vol. 11, no. 10, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[32] Hyuntae Cho, and Yunju Baek, “Practical Particulate Matter Sensing and Accurate Calibration System Using Low-Cost Commercial Sensors,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 18, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[33] Naser Hossein Motlagh et al., “Transit Pollution Exposure Monitoring Using Low-Cost Wearable Sensors,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 98, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Alicia Gressent et al., “Data Fusion for Air Quality Mapping Using Low-Cost Sensor Observations: Feasibility and Added-Value,” Environment International, vol. 143, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Andrea L. Clements et al., “Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Tools: From Research to Practice (A Workshop Summary),” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 11, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[36] Jianzhao Bi et al., “Incorporating Low-Cost Sensor Measurements into High-Resolution PM2.5 Modeling at a Large Spatial Scale,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2152-2162, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[37] Esmeralda Mendez et al., “Using Low-Cost Sensors to Assess PM2.5 Concentrations at Four South Texan Cities on the U.S.-Mexico Border,” Atmosphere, vol. 13, no. 10, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[38] Jianwei Huang et al., “Field Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors for Environmental Exposure Research,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 6, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[39] Jiayu Li et al., “Evaluation of Nine Low-Cost-Sensor-Based Particulate Matter Monitors,” Aerosol and Air Quality Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 254-270, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[40] Donggeun Park et al., “Assessment and Calibration of a Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensor Using Machine Learning (Hybrid LSTM Neural Network): Feasibility Study to Build an Air Quality Monitoring System,” Atmosphere, vol. 12, no. 10, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[41] Kamaljeet Kaur, and Kerry E. Kelly, “Performance Evaluation of the Alphasense OPC-N3 and Plantower PMS5003 Sensor in Measuring Dust Events in the Salt Lake Valley, Utah,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 2455-2470, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[42] Minxing Si et al., “Evaluation and Calibration of a Low-Cost Particle Sensor in Ambient Conditions Using Machine-Learning Methods,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1693-1707, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]