Performance Assessment of PT. X Automotive Companies Using Performance Prism and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

International Journal of Economics and Management Studies

© 2018 by SSRG - IJEMS Journal

Volume 5 Issue 8

Year of Publication : 2018

Authors : Sentot Patria. W. S, Ahmadi, Okol S Suharyo, Arica Dwi Susanto

10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V5I8P105

How to Cite?

Sentot Patria. W. S, Ahmadi, Okol S Suharyo, Arica Dwi Susanto, "Performance Assessment of PT. X Automotive Companies Using Performance Prism and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)," SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 5,  no. 8, pp. ):24-31, 2018. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V5I8P105

Abstract:

The change of security and economic conditions along with globalization that occurs in Indonesia led to tight competition in the automotive industry business. Thus, it is required for them to carry out several management improvement programs and cost savings without reducing service quality in order to compete and survive. Researchers sought solutions using Performance Prism and Weighting by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Based on the results of weighting using the AHP method, there were 3 KPIs that had a large influence on employee performance, namely KPI 8 of personnel violations percentage with a weight of 0.160, KPI 10 of the amount of customer complaints with a weight of 0.142 and KPI 14 of the number of violations found with a weight of 0.123. Of the 14 KPIs identified, 8 KPIs was identified as well performance (green traffic light), 5 KPIs with moderate performance (yellow) and the remaining 1 KPI was identified aspoor performance (red). The highest performance score was obtained by KPI 5 which is the number of personnel who receive training with the percentage of 160%. Meanwhile, the KPI with the lowest score which is also one of the red KPIs was KPI 13 of Personnel ratio compared to personnel list with a performance score of 33.33% (in red). Overall, employees performance was in good condition. This was indicated by the value of the Employee's total performance score of 85.23% (on a scale of 0% to 100%).

Keywords:

Automotive, AHP, Performance Prism, Weighting, Work Load

References:

[1] A. Neely, C. A. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring business excellence, 5(2), 6-13. 
[2] Allam, E. A. (2015). A Critique of the Balanced Scorecard as a Performance Measurement Tool. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(7), 91-99. 
[3] Anderson, J. (1995). Computational Fluid Dynamics : the Basic with Applications. singapore: McGraw-Hill. 
[4] Anthony, R. N. (2009). Management Control System. New York: Mc Graw Hill. 
[5] Antonsen, Y. (2010). The downside of the Balanced Scorecard: A case study from Norway. The Scandinavian Journal of Management, 40-50. 
[6] Atkinson, A. a. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 25-37. 
[7] Bierbusse, P. a. (1997). Measures that matter. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 6-11. 
[8] Bititci, U. T. (2002). Web enabled measurement systems – management implications. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 1273-1287. 
[9] Bose, S. a. (2007). Applying the balanced scorecard for better performance of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 653-665. 
[10] Bourne, M. M. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operation and production management, 754-771. 
[11] Cook, R. a. (1995). A scorecard for small business performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 1-18. 
[12] De Toni, A. a. (1996). Lean organization, management by process and performance measurement. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 221-236. 
[13] Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
[14] Gardoni, F. L. (2017). Double Performance Prism: innovation performance Measurement systems for manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), 4(03), 113-128. 
[15] Ghalayini, A. a. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement. Journal of Operations and Production Management, 63-80. 
[16] Ghalayini, A. N. (1997). An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 207-225. 
[17] Giannopoulos, G. H. (2013). The use of the balanced scorecard in small companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 1-22. 
[18] Ittner, C. D. (1998). Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36(Supplement), 1-35. 
[19] J. Alegre, R. L. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 333-346. 
[20] Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 23-35. 
[21] M. Hudson, A. S. (2001). Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 1096-1115. 
[22] Neely, A. a. (2002). Managing With Measures: The Stakeholder Perspective. Control, 28(7), 29-31. 
[23] Neely, A. B. (2000). Performance Measurement System Design: Developing and testing a process based approach. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 20(10), 1119-1145. 
[24] Patrizia Garengo, S. B. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 25-47. 
[25] Perera, R. M. (2017). Applicability of Performance Measurement Systems in Incentivizing the Operational Level Indirect Employees: A Literature Review. International Business Management, 1021-1027. 
[26] Prosper Gameli Agbanu, I. K. (2016). Measuring Strategic Performance in State-owned Organizations: An Evaluation of Five Proposed Contemporary Metrics. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(3), 138-151. 
[27] R. S. Kaplan, a. D. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard business review, 75-85. 
[28] Saaty, T. L. (1999). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Opeation Research, 9-26. 
[29] Wongrassamee, S. G. (2003). Performance measurement tools: the Balanced Scorecard and the EFQM Excellence Model. Measuring business excellence, 14-29. 
[30] Yadav, N. S. (2013). Performance measurement and management frameworks: research trends of the last two decades. Business Process Management Journal, 947-970.