Variates Related to the Teaching Practices of Physical Education Majors and Non-Physical Education Majors Teaching P.E. in the Selected Public Secondary Schools in the Second Congressional District of Northern Samar

International Journal of Economics and Management Studies

© 2019 by SSRG - IJEMS Journal

Volume 6 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2019

Authors : Lucilyn b. Froilan

10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V6I2P114

How to Cite?

Lucilyn b. Froilan, "Variates Related to the Teaching Practices of Physical Education Majors and Non-Physical Education Majors Teaching P.E. in the Selected Public Secondary Schools in the Second Congressional District of Northern Samar," SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, vol. 6,  no. 2, pp. 120-123, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V6I2P114

Abstract:

This study assessed the teaching practices of P.E. majors and non-P.E. majors teaching Physical Education in the selected public secondary schools in the second congressional district of Northern Samar during the school year 2008 – 2009. Specifically, this study aimed to determine the profile of the teacher respondents in terms of their age, sex, civil status, field of specialization, length of service, monthly family income, and nature of trainings/seminars attended talents/skills. It also looked into the status of other related variables which are the problems encountered by the teachers teaching Physical Education. This study also looked into the significant relationship between the respondent’s profile and the teaching practices, the significant relationship between the teaching practices and the problems encountered by the P.E. teachers and the significant difference between the teaching practices of P.E major and non-P.E. major teachers. This study employed the descriptive-correlational as a research method ad involved selected public secondary schools in the second congressional district of Northern Samar. The three groups of respondents were the P.E majors and non-P.E majors teaching P.E., students of these P.E teachers and the immediate head of the teachers. Findings revealed that the respondents’ profile in terms of age, sex, civil status, length of service, monthly family income and talents/skills were not significantly related while field of specialization and
the kind/nature of trainings/seminars attended by the respondents were found to be significantly related. Teaching practices of P.E major and non-P.E. major teachers teaching P.E were found very good and the common problems encountered by them were lack of financial support of the school administrations for their professional growth, inadequate facilities and sports equipment used in P.E., big P.E. classes and inability of the parents to meet the needs of their children in connection with P.E. activities. The test of relationship between teaching practices and the respondents’ profile in terms on age, sex, civil status, length of service, monthly family income and talents/skills were found to be not significantly related while the field of specialization and nature/kind of trainings/seminars attended by the teacher respondents were found to be significantly related. The test of relationship between teaching practices and the respondent’s profile and the test of relationship between teaching practices and problems encountered by the teachers were not significantly related. On the test of difference between the P.E major teachers and non-P.E. major teachers on the teaching practices, it was found not significantly related.

Keywords:

physical education, teaching practices, PE major and non PE. major

References:

[1]. Andin, Carmen T., Teaching Physical Education in the Philippine Schools. Philippines: Rex Bookstore, 2005
[2]. Ardales, Venancio B. Basic Concepts and Methods of Research. Quezon City: Great Books Trading, c. 1992.
[3]. Broto, Antonio S. Statistics Made Simple. Philippines: MELBROS Printing Center, 2003.
[4]. Dela Cruz, Estrella V. :”Personal Values of Teachers and Their Relationship of teaching Performance”. Unpublished Master‟s Thesis, Bulacan College of Arts and Trades, St. Paul University, 2000.
[5]. Divino, Aurora O. “The Profile, Teaching Performance and Problems of Intermediate Teachers in the Division of City Schools, Quezon City: Implication for Teacher Development Program”. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, 1987.
[6]. Froilan, Chona B. “Influence of some Teachers and other related Variables on Senior Students Attitude and Achievement in P.E.” Unpublished Master‟s Thesis, University of Eastern Philippines, 2002.
[7]. Frucher, Benjamin J.P. Guilford. Fundamental Statistics in Psychological Education. 5th Edition. Tokyo Japan: The Graw KOBAKUSELA Ltd.
[8]. Gensenmer, Robert E. Physical Education. New York: McGraw Hill Boook Company, 1980.
[9]. Mendoza, Lily G. “Work Values and Teaching Effectiveness of Full-Time College Lay Faculty of St. Paul Unversity, 1999.
[10]. Silverman, Stephen J. Encyclopedia of Educational Research. As cited by Froilan. “Influence of some Teacherand other Related variables on Students Attitude and Acheivement in P.E.”. Unpublished Master‟s Thesis, UEP,Catarman N. Samar 2002.