Understanding Students‘ Insights of Using Audio Technology in a Hybrid-Mode Higher Education Institution

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

© 2019 by SSRG - IJHSS Journal

Volume 6 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2019

Authors : Gurdip Kaur Saminder Singh

10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V6I2P104

How to Cite?

Gurdip Kaur Saminder Singh, "Understanding Students‘ Insights of Using Audio Technology in a Hybrid-Mode Higher Education Institution," SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 6,  no. 2, pp. 23-27, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V6I2P104

Abstract:

Open and Distance Learning (ODL) or Hybrid-mode (HM) Universities are often experienced as a lonely activity. In addition, the lack of appropriate guidance from Subject-Matter-Specialists (SMEs) especially in guiding their students towards completing their course assignments may lead to student-motivational struggles that can result in student attrition problems to the university. The use of internet-based technology tools are effective ways for ODL or HM institutions to communicate related course work to their students, to encourage discussion between and among students and to address administrative issues. Various innovative technologies are available today however the key is to select the most effective, accessible, and appealing technology tools. One such technology is audio technology known as Microcasting, a until now limited approach utilised in ODL or HM institutions in Malaysia. Microcasts in this study were used in helping students complete their assignments while still engaging them electronically. A relevant question yet was whether instructor-made microcasts can play a role in alleviating assignment completion problems of distance education students? The main aim of this study therefore was to investigate students‟ perceptions of the use of microcasting as a tool for completing their Tutor Marked Assignment (TMA) at an Open and Distance Learning (ODL) tertiary institution. The study investigated whether students feel at ease when using the microcasting, whether they were able to find information required about their TMA, and whether they believe it will be an effective and helpful way to complete their TMA. These were tested by making use of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) constructs namely; „Perceived ease of use‟, „Perceived usefulness‟, and „Attitude towards using the system‟. Focus-group discussions were carried out with students, and it was found that students regarded „Perceived usefulness‟ as being the most important factor of using microcasting in completing their TMA.

Keywords:

Open Distance Learning (ODL), Microcasting, Tutor Marked Assignment (TMA)

References:

[1] Hicks, A., & Graber, A. (2010). Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and Web 2.0. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 621 – 633. [2] Brindley, J.E. (1985). Completion and attrition in distance education: The learner's perspective. Paper presented at the 13th annual International Council for Distance Education World Conference, Melbourne.
[3] Cheprasov, A. (2018). Microcasting: Definition, example and impact. Study.com. Retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/microcasting-definition-example-impact.html
[4] Creelman, A. & Reneland-Forsman, L. (2013). Completion rates—a false trail to measuring course quality? European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning,2. Retrieved from www.eurodl.org/?article=583
[5] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[6] Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and
behavioral impacts. Retrieved from https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/30954/0000626.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[7] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), pp. 319–340.
[8] Davis, F. D.; Bagozzi, R. P.; Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35. [9] Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[10] Guest, G.; Namey, E. & McKenna, K. (2016). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015
[11] Kennedy, Patrick. (2009) How to combine multiple research options: Practical Triangulation. Retrieved from http://johnnyholland.org/2009/08/20/practical-triangulation [12] Parker, A. (1995). Distance education attrition. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 389–406.
[13] Raghavan, S; Mohayidin, M.G & Loo, S.C. (2014). Access to Higher Education via ODL: Addressing Attrition to Maximize University Sustainability. American Journal of Economics, 5(2). Retrieved from
http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.c.economics.201501.26.html#SecACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
[14] Siemens, G., & Conole, G. (2011). Special issue -Connectivism: Design and delivery of
social networked learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), i – iv.
[15] Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11 (4), pp. 342–365
[16] Wikipedia. (2018). Podcast. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast