On Payam Noor University Students' Attitudesto Electronic Tests for Optimization in 2016 (Case Study: Saghez PNU)

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
© 2019 by SSRG - IJHSS Journal
Volume 6 Issue 2
Year of Publication : 2019
Authors : Mahvash Janmardi
pdf
How to Cite?

Mahvash Janmardi, "On Payam Noor University Students' Attitudesto Electronic Tests for Optimization in 2016 (Case Study: Saghez PNU)," SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 6,  no. 2, pp. 52-62, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V6I2P109

Abstract:

The current research was aimed to investigate the Payam Noor University students' attitudes on electronic tests. The statistical population consisted of PNU students, Saghez branch, and based on the Cochran formula, the number of 225 students taking electronic tests was selected as the sample size. Tool for collecting data was a researcher made questionnaire. To measure the validity of the questionnaire, its content validity and reliability were investigated by using the Cronbach's alpha of 92%. Data were analyzed at two descriptive and inferential levels. According to the research findings, descriptive findings indicate a highpercentage ofwomen, the singles, unemployed, locals and the age group of the young at the Payame Noor University, while the inferential statistics suggest that most statistical population had a positive tendency to electronic tests, and such variables as gender, marriage status, academic department, electronic skill and qualityofthe test tool were found to besignificantly related with students' attitudes.

Keywords:

electronic tests, end term. Saghez, PNU

References:

[1] Choi, H. (2003). A Problem-based Learning Trail on the Internet Involving Undergraduate Nursing Students.NursEducation , 42(8), 359- 630.
[2] Chao, T. Saj, T. &Tessier, F. (2006). Establishing a Quality Review for Online Courses, EDUCAUSE Quarterly; 29(3): 32-36.
[3] Chen, N., Lin, K. &Kinshuk, C. (2004). Assessment of e-learning satisfaction from critical ncidents perspective. Proceedings of 6th International Conference OnEnterprise Information Systems, 2004 April 14-17; Porto- Portugal
[4] Engelbrecht, E. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students experience of an e-learning Tax Program. Computers and Education, 45(2), 217-229.
[5] Fathivajargah, K.; Pardakhtchi, MH.& Rabi'ea, M. (2011). The efficacy of the virtual education evaluations in the Iranian Higher Educational Syst5ems, (University of Ferdowsi, Mahshad), Quarterly of ICT in Eduactional Sciences, 1(4): 6-21
[6] Green SM, Weaver M, Voegeli D, Fitzsimmons D, Knowles J, Harrison M, et al(2006), The development and evaluation of the use of a virtual learning environment (Blackboard 5) to support the learning of pre-qualifying nursing students undertaking a human anatomy and physiology module. Nurse Educ Today, 26(5):388-95.
[7] Gullickson,A.R(2005).Student Evaluation student ;A paradigm shift for the Evaluation of students" prospect ; Quarterly Review of comparative Education , VOL .35,No.2.
[8] Habibi, H. (2016). Pathology of administering electronic tests at PNU, Quarterly of Measurement and Eduactional Evaluation, 6(16): 43-66
[9] Hussin, H., Bunyarit, F., & Hussein, R. (2009). Instructional design and e-learning: Examining learners' perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(1), 4-19
[10] Jaffee, D. (2011). Globalization and web-Based technology, Available at: http://www.unf.edu/djaffee /virtualtran.htm, [Access Date: 14/11/1395].
[11] Jokar A, KhasehA(2007). Information resources to support electronic education systems:casestudy students of virtual training courses in Shiraz university. research and planning in Higher Education.2007; 13(1):91-112 [Persian].
[12] Jahanian, R.&Etebar, Sh. (2012). Evaluating the situation of the virtual education in electronic education centers in Tehran's Universities from the view of students, Quarterly of ICT in Eduactional Sciences, 2(4): 53-65
[13] Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
[14] Karimzadegan Moghadam, D., Khodaparast, M., &Vahdat, D. (2011). An evaluation of the factors that effect on the learner satisfaction in elearning program. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Research Institute forInformation Science & Technology, 27(2), 461-478
[15] Khandaghi A, Hosseinzadeh M, Pour Smaeil F.(2009). Evaluation of students attitudes of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences about virtual education of organization that conducted the study in its: Educational Development Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Green Journal: Special Journal of Education in Medical (6):283
[16] Khodadad Husseini, H., Noori, A. & Zabihi, MR. (2013). Electronic test admission in the higher education: The application of theory of process, Model of Technology acceptance and quality of electronic services, Quarterly of Research and Planning in higher education, Issue 67: 111-136
[17] Kiakajoori, D. &Mirtaghian Roodsari, M. (2016). A look at the students' attitudes to the efficacy of the factors affecting development of electronic education (Case study: Imam Khomeini University, Noshahr, Quarterly of Sciences and Research in Marine Sciences, Issue 5: 51-66
[18] LatifnejadRoudsari R, Jafari H, Hosseini L, Esfalani A. Measuring students'(2010) .knowledge and attitude towards e-learning in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS)". Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 10(4):373-364.
[19] Lim, H., Lee, S. G. & Nam, K. (2007). Validating E-learning factors affecting training effectiveness International Journal of Information Management, 27(1): 22-35.
[20] Mirza'ea, M.; Ahmadipur , F.&Azixian, F. (2012). Investigating the attitudes of students at Yazd University of
Medical Sciences to applying electronic education in teaching clinical biochemistry, Quarterly of Studies and development Center, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, 7(2): 67-74
[21] Nagunwa, T. &Lwoga, E. (2013). Developing an eLearning strategy to implement medical competencybased curricula: experiences from Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(3): 7-21.
[22] Nneka Eke, H. (2011). Modeling LIS students intention to adopt e-learning: A case from University of Nigeria Nsukka" . Nigeria: Library Philosophy and Practice(e.journal)
[23] Rahmani, B. (2005). An investigation into content analysis of pilot virtual course related Eduactional courses, Faculty of OLoomHadis, Shahr Rey based on predetermined goals, M.A. thesis , University of Allame Tabataba'ea
[24] Roca, J. C., Chinu, C. M. & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model Human-Computer Studies, 64, 683-696.
[25] Saeedi, N.; Shahin, V.&Najjar, A. (2011). The impacts of distance learning methods on students' academic success ,Iranian Jour al of education in Medical Sciences, 11(1): 1-9
[26] Safavi, AA.;Bavaghar, M.&Ghaffari, H. (2008). Criteria for producing electronic courses and standards given their positions in electronic learning, Quarterly of Research and Planning in Higher Education . Ministry of Sciences, Research and Technology, 13(1): 28-52
[27] Sugant, R. (2014). A Framework for Measuring Service Quality of E-Learning Services, Proceedings ofthe Third International Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences ,(GB14Mumbai Conference) Mumbai, India. 19-21 December 2014.
[28] Subair, S., Kgankenna, F. (2002). Information technology knowledge and skills of agricultural researchers in Botswana". African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 12(2), 201-12.
[29] ShahsavariIsfahani S, Mosallanejad L, SobhanianS(2010). The effect of virtual and traditional methods on students learning and competency based skills. Medical Journal of Hormozgan University. 14(3):184-190.
[30] Stowell, R. &Lamshed, R. (2011). E-assessment guidelines forthe VET sector.Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.(A. F. L. F. a. N. Q. Council o. Document Number).
[31] Tafakhori, M. (2015).Investigating the characteristics of the virtual universities in Iran, M.A. thesis in Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Sari
[32] Tuma, A. (2010). An evaluation of students perceptions and engagement with elearning components in a campus based university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 57-68.
[33] Vatan-Parast . Mahboubeh, Royani Zahra., Ghasemi. Hossein,( 2015). Nursing Students’ Attitudes toward Virtual Learning and its Relationship with Learning Style. Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal of Medical Education Development Center 12(3):537 -544
[34] Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of the perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342- 365.
[35] Zameer, A. (2010). Virtual education system (current myth & future reality in Pakistan. Informing Science and Information Technology, 7(1), 1- 8.
[36] Zolfaghari, M.; Sarmadi, MR.; Negarande, R.; Zandi, B.& Ahmadi, F. (2010). The attitude of faculty members at Nursing and Midwifery School, Tehran University of medical Sciences about electronic teaching systems, Journal of Nursing and Midwifery School, Tehran University of medical Sciences, 15(1): 31-39
www.pnu.ac.ir