The Importance of Accurately Determining the Underlying Cause of Death in a Causal Chain Situation. Effects on Legal Liability. Essential Role of Forensic Investigation in Determining the Underlying Cause

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science

© 2024 by SSRG - IJHSS Journal

Volume 11 Issue 3

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : Claudiu-Gabriel Galu

10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V11I3P104

How to Cite?

Claudiu-Gabriel Galu, "The Importance of Accurately Determining the Underlying Cause of Death in a Causal Chain Situation. Effects on Legal Liability. Essential Role of Forensic Investigation in Determining the Underlying Cause," SSRG International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 11,  no. 3, pp. 23-30, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23942703/IJHSS-V11I3P104

Abstract:

Forensic research responds to requests to scientifically verify and analyse certain actions and their effects in the past to provide precise solutions for future use, both in the case in question and jurisprudence in general. This retrospection is indispensable for the establishment of irrefutable conclusions, the foundation of any legal liability that is intended to be indisputable. The novelty of the research stems from recent case law, which has emphasized the essential role of proving the causal link both for establishing the existence of the act and guilt in a criminal investigation, as well as for attracting civil liability in case of meeting the legal requirements necessary for civil liability.

Keywords:

Causal chain, Liability, Forensic, Investigation.

References:

[1] B. Winiger, E. Karner, and K. Oliphant, Digest of European Tort Law, vol 3, Essential Cases on Misconduct, De Gruyter, 2018.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] George-Cristian IOAN, Establishing Causation in the Field of Public Office Offences (I). The General Theory of Causation. The Characteristics of Public Office Offences, vol. 54, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] H.L.A. Hart, and Tony Honore, Causation in the Law, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 1985.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Ruling no. 266/16.12.2019 of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, published on https://sintact.ro
[5] George-Cristian IOAN, “Causation in the Case of Offenses of Abuse and Neglect of Duty (I). The General Theory of Causality, Features of Service Crimes,” Revista Penalmente Relevant, no. 2, pp. 54-78, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Judgement no. 2648/2020 from 09.12.2020 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice.
[7] Judgement no. 377/2020 from 22.10.2020 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice.
[8] Decision No I/23.02.2004 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice on appeals in the interest of the law in the case of complex crimes. Civil proceedings joined to criminal proceedings. The issue of secondary or collateral effects with a distinct criminal framework, United Sections, Decision No 1 of 23 February 2004, with a critical note by Raluca Mocanu.
[9] Judgement no. 2784/2021 from 16.12.2021 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice.
[10] Judgement no. 853/2021 from 14.04.2021 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice.
[11] Judgement no. 842/2019 from 18.06.2019 of the Bucharest’s Appeal Court.
[12] See Judgement no. 105/2009 of the Bucharest’s Appeal Court, First Criminal Section, published in „Revista Pandectele Române” no. 8/31.08.2009.
[13] Simona Mărginean, and Cristian Bogaru, “Airline Liability for Personal Injury or Death of Passengers Under the Montreal Convention,” Romanian Review of Private Law, no. 2, 2011.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Brașov Appeal Court, Criminal Section, Judgement no. 400/2016, Analysed by I. Curt, Confluence of risks, 2019.
[15] Judgement no. 157/2022 from 04.02.2022 of the Ploiești Appeal Court.
[16] In this regard, as pointed out in Curt. I, Succession of Risks..., it has been shown in the doctrine that a distinction must be made between biological and legal causality; see I. Dobrinescu, Crimes against person’s life, Academy Publishing of the Socialist Republic of Romania, Bucharest, P. 32, 1987.
[17] Ioana Curt, “Succession of Risks – The Effects of the Victim’s Subsequent Behaviour on the Criminal Responsibility of the Offender,” Criminal Law Writings, no. 4, 2019.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] I. Curt, see above, Succession of risks, https://sintact.ro
[19] For a thorough analysis of risk sequencing, see I. Curt, Risk sequencing, https://sintact.ro
[20] E. Oprina, Action for a declaration of nullity of the sale-purchase contract for lack of discernment. The probative force of the forensic report. Incidence of the provisions of Law no. 487/2002 on mental health and protection of persons with mental disorders, Romanian Journal of Jurisprudence no. 3 of 31.03.2009, https://sintact.ro
[21] By decision no. 121/7.06.2010 of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, Criminal Section I, published in Pandectele Române” no. 10/2010, it was held that the resolution of the case in relation to a certain legal classification or another must be based on all the evidence in the file, among which the most conclusive evidence may be that of the forensic expert report which establishes in a detailed and precise manner both how the crime was committed and its consequences and the causal link between the crime and the result.
[22] See in this regard criminal decision no. 134A of 18.09.2007 of the Cluj Court of Appeal, published in the Romanian Journal of Jurisprudence no. 1/31.01.2009
[23] Judgement no. 12/16.05.2016 of the Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of Article 1391(2) of the EC Treaty (1) and Art. 1.371 para. (1) of the Civil Code
[24] Ioan George Cristian, see above, published on https://sintact.ro