Process Line Balancing by Cellular Machining Process

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering

© 2017 by SSRG - IJME Journal

Volume 4 Issue 10

Year of Publication : 2017

Authors : Sachin S Dayma, Suresh batni

10.14445/23488360/IJME-V4I10P101

How to Cite?

Sachin S Dayma, Suresh batni, "Process Line Balancing by Cellular Machining Process," SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 4,  no. 10, pp. 1-9, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V4I10P101

Abstract:

The more the operator’s cost, the more advantageous it will be to have one operator run two or more machines. The more each machine’s cost, the less advantageous it will be to have one operator run two or more machines. In many companies I’ve visited, a manager can point out every penny that goes into what an operator costs (again, wages plus benefits). One company I visited even includes the cost of the parking space the operator uses to park his or her car. However, when it comes to machine costs, they are not nearly so knowledgeable and diligent. Again, having an accurate value for both operator and machine cost is of paramount importance to making wise operatorutilization decisions. Inflated operator costs and/or devalued machine costs lead to poor operatorutilization decisions. It will appear that using one operator for two or more machines is more costeffective than it really is

Keywords:

Process Line Balancing, Machining Process, Cellular Machining Process

References:

1. Apostolos, F. et.all,(2013) “ Energy Efficiency of Manufacturing Processes: A Critical Review”, Forty Ninth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems. (pp. 1-6).
2. Byoungtae Park,(2012) “Development of the intelligent operation planning system considering machining safety”, Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering.
3. Harley Shaiken, “The Human Impact of Automation” , Conference on Decision and Control.(1985).
4. I. Han and y. Lee, “Chaotic dynamics of repeated impacts in vibratory bowl feeders”,journal of sound and vibration249(3), 529-541. (2002).
5. James J. Hughes, “Are technological unemployment and basic income guarantee inevitable or desirable”, Journal of evolution and technology-Vol.24(2014).
6. Joachim Metternich, “Efficiency and Economic Evaluation of Cellular Manufacturing to enable Lean Machining” Forty Ninth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.(2013).
7. Jay P. Patel, “Cellular Manufacturing: A Lean Manufacturing Concept”, Principle Consultant, Quality & Productivity Solutions, Inc. (2000).
8. Liana Maria Alvarez Lopez, “Design and implementation of cellular manufacturing in a job shop environment”, Research work submitted to Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(2007).
9. Martin Maher, “Design/development for automated programmable orientation tool for Vibratory Bowl Feeder”, research work submitted to Waterford institute of technology.(2010).
10. Riccardo Campa, “Technological growth and unemployment: A global scenario analysis.”, Journal of evolution and technology-Vol.24(2014).
11. Ram Kumar Yadav, “Productivity Improvement by Load balancing of machines”, international journal of scientific research, Vol-3. (2013).
12. Richard Silversides, “Force Analysis of a Vibratory Bowl Feeder for Automatic Assembly”, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 127 / 637, JULY (2005).
13. Stefan Seifermann, “Evaluation of Work Measurement Concepts for a Cellular Manufacturing Reference Line to enable Low Cost Automation for Lean Machining”, Variety Management in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 47th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems. (2012).