Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Missile at Various Mach Numbers

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
© 2024 by SSRG - IJME Journal
Volume 11 Issue 4
Year of Publication : 2024
Authors : V. Raghavender, S. V. Ramana, A. Krishnaiah
pdf
How to Cite?

V. Raghavender, S. V. Ramana, A. Krishnaiah, "Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Missile at Various Mach Numbers," SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 4, pp. 30-39, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V11I4P104

Abstract:

The study conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), a missile serves several important objectives that contribute to the design, performance evaluation, and optimization of the missile. CFD simulations help assess the missile's aerodynamic behavior in various flight conditions. This includes analyzing lift, drag, and stability characteristics, which are crucial for achieving accurate trajectory predictions and target accuracy. By analyzing the flow patterns around the missile's surface, it can identify areas of high drag. Engineers can then modify the missile's geometry to reduce drag, resulting in improved fuel efficiency, longer range, and better maneuverability. The simulations enable the examination of how the missile's control surfaces affect its stability and maneuverability. This information is crucial for ensuring the missile can accurately follow its intended trajectory and perform any necessary mid-flight adjustments. Understanding the aerodynamic forces and thermal loads on the missile's structure helps assess its structural integrity. It can predict potential failure points and guide structural design improvements. Overall, the analysis of missiles plays a pivotal role in ensuring their effectiveness, accuracy, and safety. It helps engineers to understand complex fluid dynamics phenomena and their interactions with missile components, guiding the design process toward optimal solutions.

Keywords:

Missile Aerodynamics, Lift, Drag, Stability.

References:

[1] Bilal A. Bhutta, and Clark H. Lewis, “Supersonic/Hypersonic Flow Field Predictions over Typical Finned Missile Configurations,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 674–681, 1993.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[2] Hasan Taher M. Elkamel, Bambang Basuno, and Abobaker Mohammed Alakashi, “Two Dimensional Compressible Flow Analysis over a Generic Cruise Missile Model,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 465–466, pp. 358–362, 2013.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[3] Charles H. Murphy, and William H. Mermagen, “Flight Motion of a Continuously Elastic Finned Missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 89–98. 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Payal Tembhurnikar et al., “Computational Analysis of Flow Field Over Missile Separated from Weapon Bay Cavity at Mach 2 and 5,” 2021 IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon), Pune, India, pp. 1–6, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Kevin A. Wise, and David J.B. Roy, “Agile Missile Dynamics and Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 441–449, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] M.J. Bamber, “Two Methods of Obtaining Aircraft Trajectories from Wind Tunnel Investigations,” AERO Report, 1960.
[Google Scholar
[7] R. Meyer, A. Cenko, and S. Yaros, “An Influence Function Method for Predicting Store Aerodynamic Characteristics during Weapon Separation,” 12th Navy Symposium on Aeroballistics, 1981.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[8] Abdollah Arabshahi, and David Whitfield, “A Multi-Block Approach to Solving the Three-Dimensional Unsteady Euler Equations About a Wing-Pylon-Store Configuration,” 16th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, 1989.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[9] K. Keen, “New Approaches to Computational Aircraft/Store Weapons Integration,” 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1990.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] Lawrence E. Lijewski, “Transonic Euler Solutions on Mutually Interfering Finned Bodies,” AIAA Aeronautics, Astronautic Journal, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 982-988, 1990.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] Lawrence E. Lijewski, and Norman E. Suhs, “Time-Accurate Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Transonic Store Separation Trajectory Prediction,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 886-891, 1994.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Sun-Eun Kim et al., “A Reynolds - Averaged Navier-Stokes Solver Using Unstructured Mesh-Based Finite-Volume Scheme,” 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1998.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] E. Loth, K. Kailasanath, and R. Lohner, “Supersonic Flow Over an Axisymmetric Backward -Facing Step,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 352–359, 1992.
[CrossRef] [Publisher Link]
[14] E. Rolland Heim, CFD Wing/Pylon/Finned Store Mutual Interference Wind Tunnel Experiment, Arnold Engineering Development Center, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, USA, pp. 1-63, 1991.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] J.B. Carman, D.W. Hill, and J.P. Christopher, “Store Separation Testing Techniques at the Arnold Engineering Development Center,” Volume II: Description of Captive Trajectory Store Separation Testing in the Aerodynamic Wind Tunnel (4T), USA, pp. 1-133, 1980.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] R.J. Arnold, and C.S. Epstein, AGARD Flight Test Techniques Series, Volume 5 on Store Separation Flight Testing, AGARD, pp. 1-146, 1986.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Mohamed Yousuf et al., “Demonstration of Automated CFD Process Using Meshless Technology,” Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, pp. 1-18, 2014.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] Saurabh Pandey, and Bharat R. Agrawal, “Store Separation Simulation Using Oct-tree Grid Based Solver,” 4th Symposium on Applied Aerodynamics and Design of Aerospace Vehicles, pp. 1-10, 2009.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Scott Murman, Michael Aftosmis, and Marsha Berger, “Simulations of 6-DOF Motion with a Cartesian Method,” AIAA Paper, 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2003.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] P. Thorigny, D. Bailly, and P. Denis, “Store Separation Trajectory Simulations using “MISSILE” Onera Semi-empirical Aero-Prediction Code,” 4 th European Conference For Aerospace Science, EUCASS, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2011.
[Google Scholar
[21] V. Raghavender, and R. Kannan, “Computational Aerodynamic Analysis on Store Separation from Aircraft Using Pylon,” International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, pp. 27-31, 2014.
[Publisher Link]