Towards Digital Twin and Augmented Reality Modelling to Mitigate Silica Scaling in Geothermal Plants

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering

© 2024 by SSRG - IJME Journal

Volume 11 Issue 5

Year of Publication : 2024

Authors : Admire Chityori, Jean Bosco Byiringiro, Rehema Ndeda, Benson Gathitu

10.14445/23488360/IJME-V11I5P107

How to Cite?

Admire Chityori, Jean Bosco Byiringiro, Rehema Ndeda, Benson Gathitu, "Towards Digital Twin and Augmented Reality Modelling to Mitigate Silica Scaling in Geothermal Plants," SSRG International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11,  no. 5, pp. 70-86, 2024. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V11I5P107

Abstract:

Silica scaling in geothermal reinjection reduces efficiency, increases costs, and causes downtime. An elevated concentration of silica is experienced in the separator tank after depressurizing the brine. This causes amorphous silica to exceed its solubility limit, causing supersaturation, clogging and disrupting steam production. The study investigated the use of digital twins, augmented reality, and Industrial Internet of Things technologies for remote real-time monitoring and control of silica treatment. A laboratory-synthesized geothermal fluid with an initial concentration of 90 mg/L was prepared. Silica concentration was determined using the molybdate method with an MRC UV/VIS16-spectrophotometer. A response surface methodology based on Box Behnken was used to develop a model for optimal conditions of silica precipitation. Analytic Process Control System (APCS) system using PLC was used to monitor and control synthetic geofluid pH, volume and temperature while silica precipitation was observed. 0.9M of NaOH was introduced to geofluid to maintain a setpoint, pH11. The AR-DT model was used for real-time remote monitoring and control to avert silica scale buildup at pH11. Maximum silica extraction of 96.38% was observed at pH7.5, temperature of 80°C, volume of 5.5 L and lowest silica extraction of 66.90% was observed at pH5.5, temperature of 50°C and volume of 5.5L. The DT and AR model effectively simulated geofluid behaviour, communicating with APCS using IIoT via MQTT protocol, enabling real-time data exchange. Deviations in pH from setpoint triggered corrective action based on using historical and real-time data, sending a signal to the PLC to adjust the NaOH solution dosage. The AR model provided an immersive experience, enhancing monitoring and control efficiency.

Keywords:

Augmented reality, Box behnken, Digital twin, Industrial Internet of Things, Silica scaling.

References:

[1] Laveet Kumar et al., “Technological Advancements and Challenges of Geothermal Energy Systems: A Comprehensive Review,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 1-18, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]  
[2] M.G.J. Shalihin, P. Utami, and M.I. Nurpratama, “The Subsurface Geology and Hydrothermal Alteration of the Dieng Geothermal Field, Central Java: A Progress Report,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 417, pp. 1-12, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]  
[3] Arata Kioka, and Masami Nakagawa, “Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives in Utilizing Nanobubbles as Inhibitors of Corrosion and Scale in Geothermal Power Plant,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 149, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[4] Argyro Spinthaki et al., “The Precipitation of ‘Magnesium Silicate’ Under Geothermal Stresses Formation and Characterization,” Geothermics, vol. 74, pp. 172-180, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[5] Fusun Tut Haklidir, and Mehmet Haklidir, “Fuzzy Control of Calcium Carbonate and Silica Scales in Geothermal Systems,” Geothermics, vol. 70, pp. 230-238, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[6] Laura Spitzmüller et al., “Selective Silica Removal in Geothermal Fluids: Implications for Applications for Geothermal Power Plant Operation and Mineral Extraction,” Geothermics, vol. 95, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[7] James H. Johnston et al., “Eliminating the Problematic Deposition of Silica from Separated Geothermal Brine and Enhancing Geothermal Energy Utilisation through a Novel Nanostructured Calcium Silicate Technology: An Overview,” Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, 2021.
 [Google Scholar]
[8] Eri Hanajima, and Akira Ueda, “Recovery of Oversaturated Silica from Takigami and Sumikawa Geothermal Brines with Cationic Polymer Flocculants to Prevent Silica Scale Deposition,” Geothermics, vol. 70, pp. 271-280, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[9] Eko Tri Sumarnadi Agustinus et al., “Scale Prevention Technique to Minimized Scaling on Re-Injection Pipes in Dieng Geothermal Field, Central Java Province, Indonesia,” Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129-136, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[10] M. Ridho Ulya et al., “Effect of pH and Surfactant Concentration Sodium Lignosulfonate (SLS) towards Reduction of Silica Mass from Geothermal Brine,” Jurnal Geocelebes, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 37-43, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[11] B. Trisakti et al., “Effect of Sulphuric Acid (H2SO4) and Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Addition to Prevent Silica Scaling in Geothermal Power Plant Projection Pipes at PLTP X,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 801, pp. 1-4, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[12] Tuğba Isık et al., “A Brief Overview on Geothermal Scaling,” Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, no. 171, pp. 185-203, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[13] Felix Arie Setiawan et al., “Kinetics of Silica Precipitation in Geothermal Brine with Seeds Addition: Minimizing Silica Scaling in a Cold Re-Injection System,” Geothermal Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[14] Argyro Spinthaki et al., “Antiscalant-Driven Inhibition and Stabilization of ‘Magnesium Silicate’ Under Geothermal Stresses: The Role of Magnesium-Phosphonate Coordination Chemistry,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 11749-11760, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[15] A.D.P Putera et al., “Assessing Silica Precipitation Using Calcium Hydroxide Addition on Dieng’s Geothermal Brine,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 200, pp. 1-6, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[16] Asif Matin et al., “Scaling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes Used in Water Desalination: Phenomena, Impact, and Control; Future Directions,” Desalination, vol. 455, pp. 135-157, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[17] Paolo Taddei Pardelli et al., “Design of a Scaling Reduction System for Geothermal Applications,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 238, pp. 1-10, 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[18] E.K. Mroczek, D. Graham, and L. Bacon, “Removal of Arsenic and Silica from Geothermal Fluid by Electrocoagulation,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 4, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[19] Yoshihiko Sano, and Masataka Yamaguchi, “Preventing Silica Scale Formation using Hydroxide Ions Generated by Water Electrolysis,” Membranes, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1-17, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[20] Takuya Okazaki et al., “Fiber Optic Sensor for Real-Time Sensing of Silica Scale Formation in Geothermal Water,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2017.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[21] Fei Tao et al., “Digital Twin-Driven Product Design, Manufacturing and Service with Big Data,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 94, no. 9-12, pp. 3563-3576, 2018.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[22] Yu Zheng, Sen Yang, and Huanchong Cheng, “An Application Framework of Digital Twin and Its Case Study,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1141-1153, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[23] Toqeer Ali Syed et al., “In-Depth Review of Augmented Reality: Tracking Technologies, Development Tools, AR Displays, Collaborative AR, and Security Concerns,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-54, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[24] Gustavo Caiza, and Ricardo Sanz, “Digital Twin to Control and Monitor an Industrial Cyber-Physical Environment Supported by Augmented Reality,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 1-14, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[25] Alexios Papacharalampopoulos, and Panagiotis Stavropoulos, “Towards a Digital Twin for Thermal Processes: Control-Centric Approach,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 86, pp. 110-115, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[26] Chan Qiu et al., “Digital Assembly Technology Based on Augmented Reality and Digital Twins: A Review,” Virtual Reality and Intelligent Hardware, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 597-610, 2019.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[27] Syed Mobeen Hasan et al., “Augmented Reality and Digital Twin System for Interaction with Construction Machinery,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 564-574, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[28] Iraklis Konstantopoulos et al., “Deploying Digital Twins for Geothermal Operations with the GOOML Framework,” Proceedings 48th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, pp. 1-7, 2023.
 [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[29] Grant Buster et al., “A New Modeling Framework for Geothermal Operational Optimization with Machine Learning (GOOML),” Energies, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 1- 2021.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[30] Nicole Taverna et al., “Data Curation for Machine Learning Applied to Geothermal Power Plant Operational Data for GOOML: Geothermal Operational Optimization with Machine Learning,” Proceedings 47th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, 2022.
[Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[31] S.M. Shende et al., Indian Bureau of Mines, Project Credit Formulation & General Guidance Collection and Compilation of Technical Data, 2012.
[32] Yang, Method for the Determination of Silica in Water Application Note. [Online]. Available: http://www.perseena.com
[33] Kristina Wärmefjord et al., “Digital Twin for Variation Management: A General Framework and Identification of Industrial Challenges Related to the Implementation,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-16, 2020.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[34] Usman Ghani et al., “Hydrothermal Extraction of Amorphous Silica from Locally Available Slate,” ACS Omega, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 61136120, 2022.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
[35] Murad Alsawalha, “An approach utilizing the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to optimize Adsorption-Desorption of Natural Saudi Arabian Diatomite- with the Box- Behnken Design Technique,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2023.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]