Call For Paper October 2026

Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 13 | Issue 10 | Year 2026 | Article Id. IJME-V13I10P103 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V13I10P103

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Tensile Strength of Dual-Extruded FDM 3D- Printed ABS/PC Composite


D S Madhuri, Venkata Sushma Chinta, Nagini Yarramsetty, Katta Sugamya, K Lakshmi Chaitanya

Received Revised Accepted Published
01 Jul 2026 18 Sep 2026 22 Sep 2026 26 Oct 2026

Citation :

D S Madhuri, Venkata Sushma Chinta, Nagini Yarramsetty, Katta Sugamya, K Lakshmi Chaitanya, "Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Tensile Strength of Dual-Extruded FDM 3D- Printed ABS/PC Composite," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 22-35, 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488360/IJME-V13I10P103

Abstract

The mechanical behaviour of FDM composite materials is largely influenced by process variables, material composition, & inter-layer bonding. In order to predict the tensile strength of dual-extruded FDM composites fabricated from alternating layers of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polycarbonate (PC) using a dual-extrusion printer, this study compares various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. Such kind of systematic comparison of ML modelling on an alternating-layer ABS/PC composite along with the use of permutation importance analysis has never been performed before. The following process parameters are taken into account: layer height (0.20, 0.25, 0.30 mm), nozzle temperature (250, 255, 260 °C), print speed (50, 55, 60 mm/s), shell/wall layers (2, 3, 4), and bed temperature (90, 95, 100 °C). The experimental design is based on Taguchi L27 orthogonal array and ASTM D638 is used for preparing the tensile specimens. The tensile results range between 22.98 MPa and 49.38 MPa, indicating a strong influence of process parameters. Four ML regression models-Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting (GB), and AdaBoost are used, with the best model selected based on the highest Coefficient of Determination (R²) and the lowest RMSE value. LR achieves the highest R² value of 0.4595, followed by AdaBoost (0.4478), SVR (0.4211), and GB (0.3947). Learning-curve analysis reveals that ensemble models are overfitting. Permutation importance, which is model-independent, predicts layer thickness as the most important parameter. The results show that data-driven modelling can provide reasonable predictions of the tensile strength of dual-extrusion FDM composites.

Keywords

Dual-extruded FDM composite, Machine learning regression models, Partial dependence, Permutation importance, Taguchi L27.

References

  1. ASTM F2792-12a, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2012. [Online]. Available:https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/astm/72f015d3-d2c5-4690-b1cf-d00d8fbe1e77/astm-f2792-12a
  2. Elif Aktepe, and Uçman Ergün, “Machine Learning Approaches for FDM-Based 3D Printing: A Literature Review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1-28, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  3. C. Wang et al., “Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 36, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  4. Cleiton Lazaro Fazolo De Assis, and Cleber Augusto Rampazo, “Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of PC/ABS Blends for Functional Prototyping by FFF 3D Printing,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 214-227, 2024.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  5. Prashant Anerao et al., “A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM)-Based 3D-Printed Wood/PLA Biocomposite,” Mechanics of Advanced Composite Structures, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 261-270, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  6. Mohammad Hossein Nikzad et al., “Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Tensile Strength in 3D-Printed PLA Parts,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 264, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  7. Arda Pazarcıkcı, Koray Özsoy, and Bekir Aksoy, “Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of Manufacturing Parameters and Analysis of Mechanical Properties of PC-ABS Specimens Produced by the Fused Deposition Modeling Additive Manufacturing Method,” Polymers, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1-31, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  8. Mohd Nazri Ahmad, and Mohamad Ridzwan Ishak, “A Hybrid Taguchi – Machine Learning Framework in Optimizing FDM Printing Parameters,” Next Materials, vol. 13, pp. 1-15, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  9. Mustafa Özgür Öteyaka, Kerem Aybar, and Hasan Candan Öteyaka, “Effect of Infill Ratio on the Tensile and Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 5203-5215, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  10. Syed Waqar Ahmed et al., “Mechanical Properties of an Additive Manufactured CF-PLA/ABS Hybrid Composite Sheet,” Polymers, vol. 34, no. 11, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  11. Pui-Voon Yap, Ming-Yeng Chan, and Seong-Chun Koay, “Preliminary Study on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Multi-Materials ABS/PC Parts: Effect of Printing Parameters,” Journal of Physical Science, vol. 32. no. 2, pp. 87-104, 2021.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  12. Waqar Shehbaz, and Qingjin Peng, “Evaluation of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Mechanical Properties of Additive-Manufactured Parts,” Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 769-784, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  13. Dinesh Yadav et al., “Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Process Parameters for Multi-Material Using Artificial Neural Network,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1583-1591, 2020.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  14. Mahmut Özkül, Fatma Kuncan, and Osman Ulkir, “Predicting Mechanical Properties of FDM‐Produced Parts Using Machine Learning Approaches,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 142, no. 20, pp. 1-17, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  15. Catalin Fetecau, Felicia Stan, and Doina Boazu, “Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polyamide 12 and Its Fiber-Reinforced Composites,” Polymers, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1-28, 2025.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  16. Mahalingam Nainaragaram Ramasamy et al., “Characterization of PC-ABS and PETG Multi-Material Laminates Fabricated by MEX Method,” Polymers, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1-20, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Publisher Link]
  17. Ram Kishore Shakya, Dharamvir Mangal, and Nagendra Kumar Maurya, “Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Graphene-Reinforced PETG Filaments Fabricated by FDM: Influence of Reinforcement and Process Parameters,”
    Journal of Computers, Mechanical and Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 11-24, 2026.
    [
    CrossRef] [Publisher Link]