Comparative Evaluation of The Effectiveness And Time Taken In the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material Using 3 Different Techniques-An In – Vitro Analysis

International Journal of Medical Science

© 2019 by SSRG - IJMS Journal

Volume 6 Issue 11

Year of Publication : 2019

Authors : Dr. Ruchika Dewan, Dr.Priyanka Puri

10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V6I11P105

How to Cite?

Dr. Ruchika Dewan, Dr.Priyanka Puri, "Comparative Evaluation of The Effectiveness And Time Taken In the Removal of Root Canal Filling Material Using 3 Different Techniques-An In – Vitro Analysis," SSRG International Journal of Medical Science, vol. 6,  no. 11, pp. 15-18, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V6I11P105

Abstract:

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of Reciprocating Files, Rotary Files and Hand files for removing gutta-percha from root
canals.
Materials and Method: Forty five single rooted premolars were taken for the study. The teeth were obturated using lateral condensation technique and divided into three groups for removal of gutta percha using different techniques. Group1: Hedstrom files, Group 2: Gutta percha Removal files. Group 3:Reciproc.
Results: None of the techniques proved complete removal of the GP from the root canal.
Conclusion: However, Reciproc removed root canal filling material more effectively followed by GPR and Hand-file respectively.

Keywords:

Gutta Percha Removal, Protaper Files, Reciprocating Files

References:

[1] J. J. Ferreira, J. S. Rhodes & T. R. Pitt Ford.The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles. International Endodontic Journal,34 :267–274, 2001
[2] Bharathi G Chacko Y Lakshminarayanan L. An in-vitro analysis of gutta-percha removal using three different techniques. Endodontology, Vol. 14, 2002
[3] A. V. Masiero and F. B. BarlettaEffectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment International Endodontic JournalVolume 38, Issue 1, pages 2–7, January 2005
[4] Bueno CE, Delboni MG, de Araujo RA, Carrara HJ, Cunha RS (2006) Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in guttapercha and sealer removal usingchloroform or chlorhexidine gel. Brazilian Dental Journal 17, 139–43
[5] A. C. de Carvalho Maciel& M. F. ZaccaroScelzaEfficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal, 39, 779–784, 2006
[6] Fernando Branco Barletta, Nicole de Mello Rahde; Orlando Limongi, Abílio Albuquerque Maranhão Moura, Carolina Zanesco, Gina MazocattoIn Vitro Comparative Analysis of 2 Mechanical Techniques for Removing Gutta-Percha during Retreatment JCDA February 2007, Vol. 73, No. 1
[7] L.-S. Gu, J.-Q Ling, X. Wei & X.-Y. HuangEfficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for guttapercha removal from root canals International Endodontic Journal, 41, 288–295, 2008
[8] Cristiane Midori Takahashi, MSc, Rodrigo Sanches Cunha, PhD, Alexandre SigristDeMartin, PhD, Carlos Eduardo Fontana, MSc, Cla´udia Fernandes M. Silveira, MSc,and Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno, PhD. In Vitro Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ProTaper Universal Rotary Retreatment System for Gutta-Perch Removal with or without a Solvent JOE — Volume 35, Number 11, November 2009
[9] Chiara Pirani, Gian Andrea Pelliccioni, Silvia Marchionni, BS,Lucio Montebugnoli,Gabriela Piana, and Carlo Prati, MD.Effectiveness of Three Different Retreatment Techniques inCanals Filled With Compacted Gutta-Percha or Thermafil: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. JOE — Volume 35, Number 10, October 2009
[10] Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpc!~ao TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante AS, de Morais IG (2010) Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of MTwo R and ProTaper universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material. Journal of Endodontics 36, 1870–3.
[11] Evaluation of efficiency of three NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canal during retreatment - An in vitro study
[12] Lalit NavneetGodara K. Ravi Varma .Endodontology