Non Familiar Characterization Using A Loop Connection In A Fixed Partial Denture

International Journal of Medical Science

© 2019 by SSRG - IJMS Journal

Volume 6 Issue 12

Year of Publication : 2019

Authors : Noopur Rathi, Tanuj Minocha, Nadeem Yunus

10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V6I12P101

How to Cite?

Noopur Rathi, Tanuj Minocha, Nadeem Yunus, "Non Familiar Characterization Using A Loop Connection In A Fixed Partial Denture," SSRG International Journal of Medical Science, vol. 6,  no. 12, pp. 1-3, 2019. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V6I12P101

Abstract:

Among different components of a fixed partial denture, the role of connector is always overshadowed by either features of the pontic or a retainer. The connector is always looked upon in terms of connecting the components of a fixed partial denture. Its roles in esthetics although has been mentioned but its potential to improve the aesthetic appearance of a fixed partial denture has never been discussed. We present a case of an adult female patient who presented with a spacing of maxillary anterior teeth. A conventional fixed partial denture would have resulted in an increased width of individual tooth, which would have not matched her characteristic facial form. The case was successfully restored with a modified fixed partial denture using a loop connector. Periodontal evaluation during diagnosis and follow up proved supportive.

Keywords:

loop connector, pontic, retainer, ceramic characterization

References:

[1] Melsen B. Chicago: Quintessence; 1991. Current controversies in orthodontics; pp. 254–6
[2] Miller TE. Implications of congenitally missing teeth: Orthodontic and restorative procedures in the adult patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:115–22. [PubMed]
[3] Kumar L, Mattoo KA, Goswami R. Spring Fixed Partial Denture Designing. International Journal of Medical Research and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017;4:1-3
[4] Urrahman S, Mattoo KA. Partial Veneer Retained Fixed Partial Denture In Conjunction With Cantilevered Bridge To Fulfill The Objective Of Patient Perceived Aesthetics. Annals of International Medical and Dental Research 2017;3:DE32- DE34
[5] Mattoo K, Singh M, Goswami R. Resin bonded loop connector fixed partial denture – A subtle solution to maintain midline diastema. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 2014;2:168-70
[6] Mitchell DA, Mitchell L, Brunton P. Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 298
[7] Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:437–40.
[8] Bhandari S., Bakshi S. Survival and complications of unconventional fixed dental prosthesis for maintaining diastema and splint pathologically migrated teeth: A case series up to 8 years follow-up. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2013; 24(3):375-80
[9] Balkaya MC, Gur H, Pamuk S. The use of a resin-bonded prosthesis while maintaining the diastema: A clinical report. J Prosthetic Dent 2005; 94:507