Analysis of Plaque index and Bleeding on Probing around the Single Tooth Implant with Cement and screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis

International Journal of Medical Science

© 2022 by SSRG - IJMS Journal

Volume 9 Issue 2

Year of Publication : 2022

Authors : Md. Arifur Rahman, Shahriar Zaman, Chinmoy Kranti Das, Md. Amzad Hossain, Farhana Tauhid, Arup Kumar Saha, Mozammal Hossain

10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V9I2P103

How to Cite?

Md. Arifur Rahman, Shahriar Zaman, Chinmoy Kranti Das, Md. Amzad Hossain, Farhana Tauhid, Arup Kumar Saha, Mozammal Hossain, "Analysis of Plaque index and Bleeding on Probing around the Single Tooth Implant with Cement and screw-Retained Implant Prosthesis," SSRG International Journal of Medical Science, vol. 9,  no. 2, pp. 12-17, 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23939117/IJMS-V9I2P103

Abstract:

This prospective comparative experimental clinical study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical success of dental implants restored with cemented or screw retention systems. A total of 100 participants were enrolled for this study with the following inclusion criteria: (1) Patients having a single implant with cement and screwretained Implant prosthesis, (2) Patients with good oral hygiene, (3) Non-alcoholic and Nonsmoker patients, (4) Age between 20 - 65years. They were divided into two groups where 50 participants received cemented (Group A) and 50 received screw (Group B) retentive implant prosthesis, and a follow-up period of at least 24 months was integrated into this study. The modified plaque index (MPI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were measured. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science). The results were reported, and comparisons were done by Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and a P-Value of <0.05 was considered significant. The results revealed that after 18 and 24 months of implantation, participants in Group-A had a significantly higher number of teeth with plaque (90.0% and 96.0%, respectively) than Group B (28.0% and 54.0%, respectively). Furthermore, the tooth of Group A had a significantly higher number of teeth with BOP (70.0% and 94.0%, respectively) than the tooth of Group B (14.0% and 46.0%, respectively). It can be concluded that the screwretained implant prosthesis is preferable to the cemented prosthesis concerning their periodontal status.

Keywords:

Bleeding on probing, Cement retained prosthesis, Screw-retained prosthesis.

References:

[1] H. P. Weber, D. M. Kim, M. G. Ng, J. W. Hwang, J. P. Fiorellini, Peri‐implant Soft‐Tissue Health Surrounding Cement‐and Screw‐Retained Implant Restorations: A Multi‐Center, 3‐Year Prospective Study, Clinic Oral Implants Res. 17 (2006) 375-379.
[2] A. Manawar, B. Dhanasekar, I. N. Aparna, H. Naim, Factors Influencing the Success of Cement versus Screw-Retained Implant Restorations: A Clinical Review, J Osseo. 4 (2012) 43-47.
[3] A. Ferreiroa, M. Peñarrocha-Diago, G. Pradíes, M. F. Sola-Ruiz, R. Agustín-Panadero, Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Single-Tooth Restorations in the Molar Mandibular Region: A Retrospective Comparison Study After an Observation Period of 1 To 4 Years, J Clin Exp Dent. 7(1) (2015) 89.
[4] M. L. Brandão, M. V. Vettore, G. M. Vidigal Junior, Peri‐Implant Bone Loss in Cement‐and Screw‐Retained Prostheses: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis, J Clin Periodont. 40 (2013) 287-295.
[5] G. A. Kotsakis, L. Zhang, P. Gaillard, M. Raedel, M. H. Walter MH, I. K. Konstantinidis, Investigation of the Association Between Cement Retention and Prevalent Peri‐Implant Diseases: A Cross‐Sectional Study, J Periodonts. 87 (2016) 212-220.
[6] E. S. Cutrim, D. C. Peruzzo, B. Benatti, Evaluation of Soft Tissues Around Single-Tooth Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Restored with Cemented and Screw-Retained Crowns, J Oral Implant. 38 (2012) 700- 705.
[7] L. Genetti, C. Ercoli, E. A. Kotsailidi, C. Feng, A. Tsigarida, K. Chochlidakis K, Clinical Evaluation of Crestal Bone Levels, Peri‐Implant Indices, and Mucosal Margin Position of Immediately Impressed Posterior Dental Implants: A Cross‐Sectional Study, J Prosthet. 30 (2021) 763-768.
[8] S. E. Keith, B. H. Miller, R. D. Woody, F. L. Higginbottom, The Marginal Discrepancy of Screw-Retained and Cemented Metal-Ceramic Crowns on Implant Abutments, Int J Oral Maxilo Implants. 14 (1999) 369-378.
[9] T. G. Wilson Jr. The Positive Relationship between Excess Cement and Peri‐Implant Disease: A Prospective Clinical Endoscopic Study, J Periodont. 80 (2009) 1388-1392.
[10] P. Vigolo, S. Mutinelli, A. Givani, E. Stellini, Cemented Versus Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Single-Tooth Crowns: A 10-Year Randomized Controlled Trial, Eur J Oral Implantol. 5 (2012) 355-364.
[11] R. Pippi. Post-Surgical Clinical Monitoring of Soft Tissue Wound Healing in Periodontal and Implant Surgery, Int J Med Sci. 14 (2017) 721.
[12] D. L. Cochran, J. Simpson, H. P. Weber, D. Buser, Attachment and Growth of Periodontal Cells on Smooth and Rough Titanium, Int J Oral Maxillo Implants. 9(3) (1994).
[13] M. Tatullo, M. Marrelli, F. Paduano, The Regenerative Medicine in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: The Most Important Innovations in the Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Int J Med Sci. 12 (2015) 72.
[14] J. G. Wittneben, C. Millen, U. Brägger, Clinical Performance of Screw-Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Reconstructions - A Systematic Review, Int J Oral Maxillo Implants. 2 (2014) 29.
[15] I. Sailer, S. Mühlemann, M. Zwahlen, C. H. Hämmerle, D. Schneider, Cemented and Screw‐Retained Implant Reconstructions: A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates, Clinic Oral Implants Res. 23 (2012) 163-201.
[16] S. Sherif, H. K. Susarla, T. Kapos, D. Munoz, B. M. Chang, R. F. Wright, A Systematic Review of Screw‐Versus Cement‐Retained Implant‐Supported Fixed Restorations, J Prosthet. 23 (2014) 1-9.
[17] A. M. Decker, H. L. Wang, Diabetes and Smoking as the Potential Risk Factors for Peri-Implant Diseases, Springer, Cham. (2020) 69-81.
[18] L. L. Cheng, Limited Evidence Suggests a Higher Risk of Dental Implant Failures in Smokers than Nonsmokers, J am Dent Assoc. 147 (2016) 292-294.
[19] L. Bazli, A. M. Chahardehi, H. Arsad, B. Malekpouri, M. A. Jazi, N. Azizabadi, Factors Influencing the Failure of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review, J Compo Compound, J Compo Compound. 2 (2020) 18-25.
[20] J. Y. Shi, L. F. Zhuang, X. M. Zhang, L. F. Fan, H. C. Lai HC, Peri-Implant Conditions and Marginal Bone Loss Around Cemented and Screw-Retained Single Implant Crowns in Posterior Regions: A Retrospective Cohort Study with up to 4 Years Follow-Up, PLoS One. 13 (2018) e0191717. 
[21] M. T. Hamed, H. A. Mousy, S. K. Alamoudi, A. B. Hashem, G. H. Naguib, A Systematic Review of Screw Versus Cement-Retained Fixed Implant-Supported Reconstructions, Clinic Cosmet Investig Dent. 12 (2020) 9.
[22] M. Herten, F. Schwarz, J. Becker J, Biologic Aspects of Peri-Implantitis, Eu J Dent Implant. 1 (2008)
[23] C. H. Hämmerle, R. Glauser, Clinical Evaluation of Dental Implant Treatment, Periodont. 34 (2004) 230-239.
[24] U. Brägger, W. B. Bürging, C. H. Hämmerle, N. P. Lang, Associations between Clinical Parameters Assessed Around Implants and Teeth, Clin Oral Implant Res. 8 (1997) 412-421.
[25] R. Palmer R, Teeth and Implants, Br Dent J. 187 (1999) 183-188